These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8557954)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques.
    McKendrick AM; Brennan NA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO; Horner DG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A new ophthalmologic refractometer assisted by a microprocessor].
    Corno F; Ratier C; Simon J; Zenatti C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1984; 7(6-7):485-92. PubMed ID: 6501787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
    Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparative study of the reflective and apperceptive refractions (author's transl)].
    Grimm W; Roloff C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1979 Jan; 174(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 431022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Humphrey Vision Analyzer tm: reliability and validity of refractive-error measures.
    Kratz LD; Flom MC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Oct; 54(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 605920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The AO SR IIItm Subjective Refraction System: comparison with Phoropter measures.
    Woo GC; Woodruff ME
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Aug; 55(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 742650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Biometrics and aphakia (author's transl)].
    van der Heijde GL; Stilma JS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1976 Sep; 169(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 1003819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparisons of manual and automatic refractometry with subjective results].
    Wübbolt IS; von Alven S; Hülssner O; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):904-7. PubMed ID: 17131251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of peripheral refraction techniques.
    Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):429-46. PubMed ID: 19342977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.