98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8558855)
1. Heterogeneity and reproducibility of microvessel counts in breast cancer.
de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Lab Invest; 1995 Dec; 73(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 8558855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Rose C; Bak M; Sørensen FB
Lab Invest; 1998 Dec; 78(12):1563-73. PubMed ID: 9881956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully automated microvessel counting and hot spot selection by image processing of whole tumour sections in invasive breast cancer.
Beliën JA; Somi S; de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Mar; 52(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 10450177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of microvessel counts in breast cancer specimens.
Marson LP; Kurian KM; Miller WR; Dixon JM
Br J Cancer; 1999 Nov; 81(6):1088-93. PubMed ID: 10576669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer.
Sullivan CA; Ghosh S; Ocal IT; Camp RL; Rimm DL; Chung GG
Hum Pathol; 2009 Feb; 40(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18799189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between vascularization and proliferation in invasive breast cancer.
Beliën JA; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
J Pathol; 1999 Nov; 189(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 10547591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing microvessel counts according to tumor zone in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Jitsuiki Y; Hasebe T; Tsuda H; Imoto S; Tsubono Y; Sasaki S; Mukai K
Mod Pathol; 1999 May; 12(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 10349987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of microvessel density and mast cell density for the survival of Thai patients with primary colorectal cancer.
Yodavudh S; Tangjitgamol S; Puangsa-art S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 18672639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do prognostic marker studies on core needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma accurately reflect the marker status of the tumor?
Jacobs TW; Siziopikou KP; Prioleau JE; Raza S; Baum JK; Hayes DF; Schnitt SJ
Mod Pathol; 1998 Mar; 11(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 9521472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphatic density and blood vessel density in invasive breast carcinomas.
El-Gohary YM; Metwally G; Saad RS; Robinson MJ; Mesko T; Poppiti RJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Apr; 129(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 18343785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of periductal lymphatic and blood vascular densities in intraductal carcinoma of the breast.
El-Gohary YM; Metwally G; Saad RS; Robinson MJ; Mesko T; Poppiti RJ
Breast J; 2009; 15(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 19645781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of microvessel density in breast cancer of Thai women.
Kanjanapanjapol S; Wongwaisayawan S; Phuwapraisirisan S; Wilasrusmee C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 17375633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer.
Su MY; Cheung YC; Fruehauf JP; Yu H; Nalcioglu O; Mechetner E; Kyshtoobayeva A; Chen SC; Hsueh S; McLaren CE; Wan YL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Oct; 18(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 14508784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of angiogenesis assessment with anti-factor-VIII and anti-CD31 immunostaining in non-small cell lung cancer.
Giatromanolaki A; Koukourakis MI; Theodossiou D; Barbatis K; O'Byrne K; Harris AL; Gatter KC
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Dec; 3(12 Pt 1):2485-92. PubMed ID: 9815651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of tumor angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinomas: absence of correlation with prognosis and pathological factors.
Fridman V; Humblet C; Bonjean K; Boniver J
Virchows Arch; 2000 Dec; 437(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 11193472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microvessel density compared with the Chalkley count in a prognostic study of angiogenesis in breast cancer patients.
Hansen S; Sørensen FB; Vach W; Grabau DA; Bak M; Rose C
Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 15139990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of microvessel density of breast carcinoma: an assessment of the inter- and intraobserver variation.
Ingeholm P; Pedersen L; Holck S
Breast; 1999 Oct; 8(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 14965739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in a confirmatory study design on 836 breast cancer patients.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Sørensen FB; Bak M; Vach W; Rose C
Clin Cancer Res; 2000 Jan; 6(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 10656442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining the technique of angiogenesis assessment in invasive breast cancer.
Martin L; Green B; Renshaw C; Lowe D; Rudland P; Leinster SJ; Winstanley J
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(8):1046-54. PubMed ID: 9376265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer.
de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Histopathology; 2000 Apr; 36(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 10759944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
