These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8559543)

  • 1. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5. PubMed ID: 8559543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Saad A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 88(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 8684752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.
    Doukas DJ; Elkins TE
    Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Minkoff H; Powderly KR; Chervenak F; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 14754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. C-section for organ donation.
    Berkowitz ST; Newman LE; Mathieu DR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(2):22; discussion 22-4. PubMed ID: 2318622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Skupski DW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 8233254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent.
    Lescale KB; Inglis SR; Eddleman KA; Peeper EQ; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8688110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 3763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients' autonomy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 8750591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Elkins TE; Brown D; Barclay M; Andersen HF
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 2131088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):311-6. PubMed ID: 2304702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 201(6):560.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19762005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetric decision-making: responses to patients who request cesarean delivery.
    Johnson SR; Elkins TE; Strong C; Phelan JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):847-50. PubMed ID: 3703409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing cesarean delivery rates in managed care organizations.
    Mawson AR
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Aug; 8(8):730-40. PubMed ID: 12212760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):232.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18667194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified?
    Kalish RB; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 18052833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.
    Kalish RB; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 18388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 23059404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RESPONDING PROFESSIONALLY TO REQUESTS FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY.
    Chervenak F; McCullough L
    Georgian Med News; 2017; (268-269):7-11. PubMed ID: 28820404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.