These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8560496)

  • 1. Evaluation of contact sensitivity to formaldehyde and tetramethylthiuram monosulfide using a modified lymphocyte transformation test.
    Li Q; Wang ZY; Inagaki H; Li YJ; Minami M
    Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 104(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 8560496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of cross-sensitization among dye-intermediate agents using a modified lymphocyte transformation test.
    Li Q; Inagaki H; Minami M
    Arch Toxicol; 1996; 70(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 8740535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation on contact sensitivity from DNCB and DNBS using lymphocyte blastogenesis response test.
    Li Q; Aoyama K
    Sangyo Igaku; 1991 Nov; 33(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 1770618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of an in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for predictive assessment of immunologic responsiveness to contact sensitizers.
    Robinson MK
    J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 2723450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of an optimized in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay to detect contact sensitivity to nickel sulfate in mice.
    Robinson MK; Sneller DL
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1990 Jun; 104(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 1694310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lymphocyte transformation and thiuram sensitization.
    Kimber I; Quirke S; Cumberbatch M; Ashby J; Paton D; Aldridge RD; Hunter JA; Beck MH
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1868698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact sensitizers in resins based on phenol and formaldehyde.
    Bruze M
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1985; 119():1-83. PubMed ID: 2934936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of contact sensitivity to DNFB in guinea pigs genetically differing in their response to DNP skin protein conjugates.
    Polak L; Polak-Wyss A; Frey JR
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1974; 46(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 4138584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCSA) photoallergy using in vitro photohapten-modified Langerhans cell-enriched epidermal cells.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Von Bargen EC; Stuard SB; Ridder GM
    J Invest Dermatol; 1991 Aug; 97(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 1649226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphologic changes in draining lymph nodes and in lymphocyte cultures after sensitization with complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Correlation with immunologic events in vivo and in culture.
    Dvorak AM; Bast RC; Dvorak HF
    J Immunol; 1971 Aug; 107(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 5568772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
    Maurer T; Kimber I
    Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro lymphocyte responses in contact hypersensitivity. 3.
    Milner JE
    J Invest Dermatol; 1972 Jun; 58(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 5030659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An optimized lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for detecting the response of contact sensitized or photosensitized lymphocytes to hapten or photohapten modified antigen presenting cells.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Fletcher ER; Sneller DL; Robinson MK
    Toxicol In Vitro; 1990; 4(4-5):289-92. PubMed ID: 20702180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of NiSO4 and NiCl2 as sensitizers in the guinea pig.
    Dorn CR; Warner RD; Ahmed W
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1988; 85(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 3350610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of dose-response relationship in contact sensitivity using an in vitro assay.
    Li Q; Aoyama K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jul; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 1424586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Route of contact sensitization and in vitro lymphocyte transformation.
    Baer RL; Rosenthal SA
    J Invest Dermatol; 1978 Mar; 70(3):138-40. PubMed ID: 632618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value of assessment of lymph node weight and T-lymphocyte proliferation in contact sensitivity in acrylates.
    Bull JE; Parker D; Turk JL
    J Invest Dermatol; 1985 Nov; 85(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 3877123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
    Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
    Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of formaldehyde contact sensitivity: dose response relationship in the guinea pig maximization test.
    Andersen KE; Boman A; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 2420109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds.
    Kashima R; Okada J; Ikeda Y
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 7927080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.