104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8560496)
1. Evaluation of contact sensitivity to formaldehyde and tetramethylthiuram monosulfide using a modified lymphocyte transformation test.
Li Q; Wang ZY; Inagaki H; Li YJ; Minami M
Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 104(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 8560496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cross-sensitization among dye-intermediate agents using a modified lymphocyte transformation test.
Li Q; Inagaki H; Minami M
Arch Toxicol; 1996; 70(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 8740535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation on contact sensitivity from DNCB and DNBS using lymphocyte blastogenesis response test.
Li Q; Aoyama K
Sangyo Igaku; 1991 Nov; 33(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 1770618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of an in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for predictive assessment of immunologic responsiveness to contact sensitizers.
Robinson MK
J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 2723450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of an optimized in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay to detect contact sensitivity to nickel sulfate in mice.
Robinson MK; Sneller DL
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1990 Jun; 104(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 1694310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphocyte transformation and thiuram sensitization.
Kimber I; Quirke S; Cumberbatch M; Ashby J; Paton D; Aldridge RD; Hunter JA; Beck MH
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1868698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact sensitizers in resins based on phenol and formaldehyde.
Bruze M
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1985; 119():1-83. PubMed ID: 2934936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of contact sensitivity to DNFB in guinea pigs genetically differing in their response to DNP skin protein conjugates.
Polak L; Polak-Wyss A; Frey JR
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1974; 46(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 4138584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCSA) photoallergy using in vitro photohapten-modified Langerhans cell-enriched epidermal cells.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Von Bargen EC; Stuard SB; Ridder GM
J Invest Dermatol; 1991 Aug; 97(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 1649226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphologic changes in draining lymph nodes and in lymphocyte cultures after sensitization with complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Correlation with immunologic events in vivo and in culture.
Dvorak AM; Bast RC; Dvorak HF
J Immunol; 1971 Aug; 107(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 5568772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro lymphocyte responses in contact hypersensitivity. 3.
Milner JE
J Invest Dermatol; 1972 Jun; 58(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 5030659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An optimized lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for detecting the response of contact sensitized or photosensitized lymphocytes to hapten or photohapten modified antigen presenting cells.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Fletcher ER; Sneller DL; Robinson MK
Toxicol In Vitro; 1990; 4(4-5):289-92. PubMed ID: 20702180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of NiSO4 and NiCl2 as sensitizers in the guinea pig.
Dorn CR; Warner RD; Ahmed W
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1988; 85(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 3350610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of dose-response relationship in contact sensitivity using an in vitro assay.
Li Q; Aoyama K
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jul; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 1424586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Route of contact sensitization and in vitro lymphocyte transformation.
Baer RL; Rosenthal SA
J Invest Dermatol; 1978 Mar; 70(3):138-40. PubMed ID: 632618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of assessment of lymph node weight and T-lymphocyte proliferation in contact sensitivity in acrylates.
Bull JE; Parker D; Turk JL
J Invest Dermatol; 1985 Nov; 85(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 3877123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of formaldehyde contact sensitivity: dose response relationship in the guinea pig maximization test.
Andersen KE; Boman A; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE
Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 2420109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 7927080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
