BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8565454)

  • 21. Nickel contact hypersensitivity in children.
    Silverberg NB; Licht J; Friedler S; Sethi S; Laude TA
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2002; 19(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11994170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back?
    Björk AK; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Nielsen C; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27593358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nickel chloride/chlorides of divalent metal interactions in nickel-sensitive subjects.
    Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
    Exp Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 5(5):254-9. PubMed ID: 8981023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease].
    Scola N; Hunzelmann N; Ruzicka T; Kobus S; Adamek E; Altmeyer P; Dickel H
    Hautarzt; 2010 Dec; 61(12):1056-60. PubMed ID: 20664991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
    Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
    Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of self-testing as a method to estimate the prevalence of nickel allergy.
    Josefson A; Svensson A; Färm G; Engfeldt M; Meding B
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2011 Sep; 91(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 21874219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reactivity to euro coins and sensitization thresholds in nickel-sensitive subjects.
    Seidenari S; Giusti F; Pellacani G; Antelmi AR; Foti C; Bonamonte D; Ayala F; Balato G; Cristaudo A; Stingeni L; Lisi P
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15987291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Usage test with palladium-coated earrings in patients with contact allergy to palladium and nickel.
    Tillman C; Engfeldt M; Hindsén M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Nov; 69(5):288-95. PubMed ID: 23909829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of patch testing with nickel sulfate in TRUE Test and in petrolatum at 2.5% and 5% concentrations.
    Bach RO; Svendsen MT; Mose KF; Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Mar; 86(3):233-234. PubMed ID: 34800302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concentrations and stability of methyl methacrylate, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and nickel sulfate in commercial patch test allergen preparations.
    Siegel PD; Fowler JF; Law BF; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24731086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible.
    Mortz CG; Kjaer HF; Eller E; Osterballe M; Norberg LA; Høst A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Andersen KE
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Feb; 24(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23331531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Nickel Allergic Reactions to the Essure Micro Insert: Theoretical Risk or Daily Practice?
    Siemons S; Vleugels M; van Eijndhoven H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):140-144. PubMed ID: 27621196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure?
    Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of pretreatment with a urea-containing emollient on nickel allergic skin reactions.
    Kuzmina N; Nyrén M; Lodén M; Edlund F; Emtestam L
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15848983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is it possible to improve the prognosis in nickel contact dermatitis?
    Kalimo K; Lammintausta K; Jalava J; Niskanen T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 9330818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interaction of metals in nickel-sensitive patients.
    Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Nov; 29(5):251-3. PubMed ID: 8112064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
    Disphanurat W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Allergic patch test reactions to palladium chloride in schoolchildren.
    Kanerva L; Kerosuo H; Kullaa A; Kerosuo E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jan; 34(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8789224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.