These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8565454)

  • 41. Patch testing with nickel chloride in a hydrogel.
    Fullerton A; Menné T; Hoelgaard A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2914431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
    Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
    Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
    Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Iontophoresis of nickel elicits a delayed cutaneous response in sensitized individuals that is similar to an allergic patch test reaction.
    Brasch J; Hüttemann M; Proksch E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jan; 42(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10644023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cutaneous reactivity to allergens at 24-h increases from the antecubital fossa to the wrist: an echographic evaluation by means of a new image analysis system.
    Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Mar; 26(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 1505182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to a Cell Phone.
    Tammaro A; Magri F; Pigliacelli F; Gelormini E; Parisella Francesca R; Chello C; Persechino S
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):339-340. PubMed ID: 30665487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
    Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation--evaluation of a public health intervention.
    Thyssen JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Sep; 65 Suppl 1():1-68. PubMed ID: 21777241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Diagnostic value of the lymphocyte proliferation test in nickel contact allergy and provocation in occupational coin dermatitis.
    Räsänen L; Tuomi ML
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Oct; 27(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 1451491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis.
    Köster R; Vieluf D; Kiehn M; Sommerauer M; Kähler J; Baldus S; Meinertz T; Hamm CW
    Lancet; 2000 Dec; 356(9245):1895-7. PubMed ID: 11130387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis.
    Mortazavi H; Ehsani A; Sajjadi SS; Aghazadeh N; Arian E
    BMC Dermatol; 2016 Jul; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 27405224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel.
    Anveden I; Lindberg M; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Isaksson M; Liden C; Sommerlund M; Wahlberg JE; Wilkinson JD; Willis CM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 15209811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hand dermatitis and allergic patch test reactions caused by nickel in electroplaters.
    Kanerva L; Kiilunen M; Jolanki R; Estlander T; Aitio A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Oral mucosa patch test: a new tool to recognize and study the adverse effects of dietary nickel exposure.
    Picarelli A; Di Tola M; Vallecoccia A; Libanori V; Magrelli M; Carlesimo M; Rossi A
    Biol Trace Elem Res; 2011 Feb; 139(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 20204548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Patch Testing in Children and Adolescents With Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
    Meena S; Garg T; Chander R
    Skinmed; 2016; 14(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 27784513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Telethermography: an objective method for evaluating patch test reactions.
    Laino L; Di Carlo A
    Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 20123644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
    Serup J; Staberg B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.