These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8565682)

  • 1. [Densitometric evaluation of the proximal femur after cemented hip prosthesis].
    Mazurkiewicz H; Gusta A; Kwas A
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1995; 60(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 8565682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 7559717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Bobyn JD; Mortimer ES; Glassman AH; Engh CA; Miller JE; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):79-96. PubMed ID: 1729025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur 18 months after total hip arthroplasty with Exeter stem].
    Damborg F; Nissen N; Jørgensen HR; Abrahamsen B; Brixen KT
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Feb; 167(9):1038-41. PubMed ID: 15804001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between stress shielding and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated stems.
    Kwon DG; Lee TJ; Kang JS; Moon KH
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1728-30. PubMed ID: 23937922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].
    Roth A; Richartz G; Sander K; Sachse A; Fuhrmann R; Wagner A; Venbrocks RA
    Orthopade; 2005 Apr; 34(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 15726320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
    Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Periprosthetic bone remodeling after cementless hip endoprosthesis stem implantation].
    Dragan S; Wall A
    Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(3-4):170-6. PubMed ID: 16813259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Engh CA; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):1009-20. PubMed ID: 1522088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density measurement using two different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):852-5. PubMed ID: 7953225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alendronate reduces periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
    Venesmaa PK; Kröger HP; Miettinen HJ; Jurvelin JS; Suomalainen OT; Alhav EM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2126-31. PubMed ID: 11697810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Kröger H; Venesmaa P; Jurvelin J; Miettinen H; Suomalainen O; Alhava E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):66-74. PubMed ID: 9678034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos short-stemmed prosthesis.
    Zeh A; Pankow F; Röllinhoff M; Delank S; Wohlrab D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Apr; 79(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 23821969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate changes of bone density caused by the implantation of a femoral stem--a DEXA study. Ulf.Leichtle@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
    Leichtle UG; Leasure J; Martini F; Leichtle CI
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 22117256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. A quantitative comparison of cobalt-chromium and titanium femoral stems with use of dual x-ray absorptiometry.
    Hughes SS; Furia JP; Smith P; Pellegrini VD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Feb; 77(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 7844129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    McCarthy CK; Steinberg GG; Agren M; Leahey D; Wyman E; Baran DT
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Sep; 73(5):774-8. PubMed ID: 1894664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.