These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8565682)

  • 21. A prospective study of proximal femur bone mass following cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasty.
    Marchetti ME; Steinberg GG; Greene JM; Jenis LG; Baran DT
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 8797126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Radiographic study of bone resorption at the proximal end of the femur after total hip replacements].
    Miyake N
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Dec; 63(12):1443-51. PubMed ID: 2625575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Use of densitometric examination in evaluation of cementless hip endoprosthesis].
    Kusz D; Kaleta M; Bozek M; Słuzałek M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1996; 61(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 8753829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Periprosthetic bone remodeling using a triple-taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Buckland AJ; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD; Hardidge AJ; Ng KW; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1083-90. PubMed ID: 19879719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Femoral densitometry as potential preoperative indicator for cementation of hip prosthesis].
    Baruffaldi F; Barbanti Brodano G; Testoni M; Gnudi S; Paderni S; Toni A; Giunti A
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 8975301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Validity and reproducibility of osteodensitometric DEXA-measurements following total hip endoprosthesis].
    Martini F; Schmidt B; Sell S
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9199071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Malkani AL; Sim FH; Chao EY
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 8414438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodeling.
    Sychterz CJ; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Jan; (322):285-92. PubMed ID: 8542707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Bony changes at the femur side after hip joint replacement: radiologic analysis of 80 hip joints].
    Wen LC; Ma ZT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 32(9):539-41. PubMed ID: 7720425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
    Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of sliding-taper compared with composite-beam cemented femoral prosthesis loading regime on proximal femoral bone remodeling: a randomized clinical trial.
    Jayasuriya RL; Buckley SC; Hamer AJ; Kerry RM; Stockley I; Tomouk MW; Wilkinson JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jan; 95(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23283370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Periprosthetic bone density in uncemented femoral hip implants with proximal hydroxylapatite coating.
    Massari L; Bagni B; Biscione R; Traina GC
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1996; 54(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 8731411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs. A study after total hip arthroplasty.
    West JD; Mayor MB; Collier JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Jan; 69(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 3805071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Wixson RL; Stulberg SD; Van Flandern GJ; Puri L
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jun; 12(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 9195311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.
    Maloney WJ; Sychterz C; Bragdon C; McGovern T; Jasty M; Engh CA; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):15-26. PubMed ID: 8981879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic analysis of bisphosphonate intervention on periprosthetic BMD as a function of stem design.
    Knusten AR; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Sangiorgio SN
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1292-7. PubMed ID: 24703781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Altered load history affects periprosthetic bone loss following cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Bryan JM; Sumner DR; Hurwitz DE; Tompkins GS; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8893770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Focal lytic lesions associated with femoral stem loosening in total hip prosthesis.
    Scott WW; Riley LH; Dorfman HD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 May; 144(5):977-82. PubMed ID: 3872583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Localized bone resorption in the femur in mechanical failure of cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Carlsson AS; Gentz CF; Linder L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1983 Jun; 54(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 6858658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.