These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8567007)

  • 1. Estimating defibrillation efficacy using combined upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation testing.
    Malkin RA; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jan; 43(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 8567007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose.
    Malkin RA; Burdick DS; Johnson EE; Pilkington TC; Swanson DK; Ideker RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 8335329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability to fibrillation in a transthoracic guinea pig model.
    Li H; Malkin RA
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Apr; 32(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 10338034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of the upper limit of vulnerability using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms.
    Swerdlow C; Shivkumar K; Zhang J
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(24):3028-33. PubMed ID: 12810611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An up-down Bayesian, defibrillation efficacy estimator.
    Compos AT; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 20(5 Pt 1):1292-300. PubMed ID: 9170129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sildenafil citrate on the inducibility of ventricular fibrillation and upper limit of vulnerability in swine.
    Kanlop N; Shinlapawittayatorn K; Sungnoon R; Chattipakorn S; Lailerd N; Chattipakorn N
    Med Sci Monit; 2008 Oct; 14(10):BR205-9. PubMed ID: 18830184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-tailored implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing using the upper limit of vulnerability: the TULIP protocol.
    Lemke B; Lawo T; Zarse M; Lubinski A; Kreutzer U; Mueller J; Schuchert A; Mitzenheim S; Danilovic D; Deneke T;
    Europace; 2008 Aug; 10(8):907-13. PubMed ID: 18515789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dilemma of ICD implant testing.
    Swerdlow CD; Russo AM; Degroot PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 17461879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cilostazol attenuates ventricular arrhythmia induction and improves defibrillation efficacy in swine.
    Kanlop N; Shinlapawittayatorn K; Sungnoon R; Weerateerangkul P; Chattipakorn S; Chattipakorn N
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 88(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 20555410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of nitric oxide synthase modulation on resuscitation success in a swine ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest model.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Rhee BJ; Davies LR; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16039037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upper limit of vulnerability determination during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to minimize ventricular fibrillation inductions.
    Glikson M; Gurevitz OT; Trusty JM; Sharma V; Luria DM; Eldar M; Shen WK; Rea RF; Hammill SC; Friedman PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 15566924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle: evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy.
    Tang L; Hwang GS; Song J; Chen PS; Lin SF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):740-9. PubMed ID: 17388914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.
    Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA
    Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of chronaxies for ventricular fibrillation induction, defibrillation, and cardiac stimulation: unexpected findings and their implications.
    Lawo T; Deneke T; Schrader J; Danilovic D; Wenzel B; Buddensiek M; Muegge A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 19175850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
    Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.