These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8567443)

  • 1. Effect of interstimulus interval on evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Lina-Granade G; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):55-61. PubMed ID: 8567443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral suppression and stimulus rate effects on evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Lina-Granade G; Liogier X; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1997 May; 107(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 9165349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory selective attention.
    Michie PT; LePage EL; Solowij N; Haller M; Terry L
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 8880181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative influence of repeated measurement and of attention on evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Meric C; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Jul; 113(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 8379301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evoked otoacoustic emission: behaviour under the forward masking paradigm.
    Kevanishvili Z; Gobsch H; Gvelesiani T; Gamgebeli Z
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 1488243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 9667426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the conditioning click on click-evoked otoacoustic emission.
    Kevanishvili Z; Tietze G; Gobsch H
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 8881003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):89-98. PubMed ID: 9387988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Kulawiec JT; Orlando MS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 8654906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 61(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 1526893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B; Fransson A
    Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 7642444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12031522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions after vestibular nerve section in chinchillas.
    Murao MS; Bento RF; Sanchez TG; Ribas GC
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 16497453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preliminary results of otoacoustic emission measurement and standard values in young subjects with normal hearing. Part I: Measurement of spontaneous and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (SOAE, EOAE)].
    Kowalska S; SuĊ‚kowski W; Murowaniecki Z
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 7970782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: a model.
    Xue S; Mountain DC; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 8647730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):101-20. PubMed ID: 10913888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.