These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8567448)

  • 1. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley AE; Wen H; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8567448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of interaural intensity and time disparity on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Shi Y; Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):259-65. PubMed ID: 9282908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contralateral acoustic stimulation induces a phase advance in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Giraud AL; Perrin E; Chéry-Croze S; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 8789811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study on suppression of otoacoustic emissions: lateral domain.
    Oliveira JR; Fernandes CF; Costa Filho OA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 22030959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.
    Boothalingam S; Kurke J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 19(4):421-434. PubMed ID: 29736560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Relationship between Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission and Unmasking of Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Kalaiah MK; Mishra K; Shastri U
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 26(4):e676-e682. PubMed ID: 36405487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: role of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Tavartkiladze GA; Frolenkov GI; Artamasov SV
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Mar; 116(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 8725517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony lack efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Bordelon J; Rose K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Aug; 14(6):302-13. PubMed ID: 14552424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.