These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8567454)

  • 1. Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2208-12. PubMed ID: 8567454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of selection in sublines and crossing on genetic response and inbreeding.
    Smith C; Quinton M
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Oct; 71(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 8226362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of inbreeding in laying hens by applying optimum genetic contribution and gene flow theory.
    König S; Tsehay F; Sitzenstock F; von Borstel UU; Schmutz M; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Poult Sci; 2010 Apr; 89(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 20308397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 11325188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating the benefits and perils of importing genetic material in small cattle breeding programs via simulation.
    Obšteter J; Jenko J; Pocrnic I; Gorjanc G
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Aug; 106(8):5593-5605. PubMed ID: 37474361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations.
    Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2575-83. PubMed ID: 9814896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MIM: an indirect method to assess inbreeding and coancestry in large incomplete pedigrees of selected dairy cattle.
    Colleau JJ; Sargolzaei M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Jun; 128(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 21554410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding.
    Rosvall O; Mullin TJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Aug; 107(4):629-42. PubMed ID: 12851766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of computerized mate selection programs to control inbreeding of Holstein and Jersey cattle in the next generation.
    Weigel KA; Lin SW
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Apr; 83(4):822-8. PubMed ID: 10791799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds.
    Gandini G; Stella A; Del Corvo M; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1790-8. PubMed ID: 24440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SelAction: software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs.
    Rutten MJ; Bijma P; Woolliams JA; van Arendonk JA
    J Hered; 2002; 93(6):456-8. PubMed ID: 12642649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.