These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8567456)
1. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits. Wei M; van der Werf JH J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens. Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Animal model estimation of additive and dominance variances in egg production traits of poultry. Wei M; van der Werf JH J Anim Sci; 1993 Jan; 71(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 8454553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens. Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of genetic parameters based on individual and group mean records in laying hens. Nurgiartiningsih VM; Mielenz N; Preisinger R; Schmutz M; Schueler L Br Poult Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 15623212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation of Columbia, Suffolk, and crossbred lamb birth and weaning weights: systematic effects and heterogeneous variances. Vargas Jurado N; Notter DR; Taylor JB; Brown DJ; Mousel MR; Lewis RM J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38085934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in Australia. Newman S; Reverter A; Johnston DJ J Anim Sci; 2002 Jul; 80(7):1801-8. PubMed ID: 12162647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry. Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic parameters, reciprocal cross differences, and age-related heterosis of egg-laying performance in chickens. Ni A; Calus MPL; Bovenhuis H; Yuan J; Wang Y; Sun Y; Chen J Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Dec; 55(1):87. PubMed ID: 38062365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait]. Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset. Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs. Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits. Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine. Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrids generated by crossing elite laying chickens exhibited heterosis for clutch and egg quality traits. Isa AM; Sun Y; Shi L; Jiang L; Li Y; Fan J; Wang P; Ni A; Huang Z; Ma H; Li D; Chen J Poult Sci; 2020 Dec; 99(12):6332-6340. PubMed ID: 33248549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection for heterosis from crossbred populations: comparison of the F3 and backcross populations. Sheridan AK Br Poult Sci; 1986 Dec; 27(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 3815123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model. Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs. Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inheritance of hatchability in broiler chickens and its relationship to egg quality traits. Wolc A; White IM; Hill WG; Olori VE Poult Sci; 2010 Nov; 89(11):2334-40. PubMed ID: 20952695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]