These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8570108)
41. [The main directions of improving the system of state accounting and control of radioactive substances and radioactive waste products]. Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (8):8-12. PubMed ID: 23088018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Position Statement of the Health Physics Society PS029-0: WHAT IS AN HP? Health Physics Society Health Phys; 2019 Dec; 117(6):664-665. PubMed ID: 31652208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Is it useful to assess annual effective doses that are less than 100 mSv? Strom DJ; Cameron JR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 11926376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Implementation of a national metrology network of radionuclides used in nuclear medicine. dos Santos JA; Iwahara A; Nícoli IG; Corrêa RS; Alabarse FG; dos Santos CE; Xavier AM; Garcia EJ; Tauhata L; Lopes RT Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1114-8. PubMed ID: 16549360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Notification levels related to the control of radioactive discharges. Kanyár B; Volent G; Tóth K Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1558-60. PubMed ID: 18485719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients. Holmberg O; Malone J; Rehani M; McLean D; Czarwinski R Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 20638809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessment of medical occupational radiation doses in Costa Rica. Mora P; Acuña M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):230-2. PubMed ID: 21856694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Position Statement of the Health Physics Society PS010-4: Radiation Risk in Perspective. Health Phys; 2020 Jan; 118(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 31703015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management lacks medical input. Baverstock K; Ball DJ BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7529):1409. PubMed ID: 16339263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Doctors urged to use diagnostic alternatives to reactor-produced isotopes. Eggertson L CMAJ; 2009 May; 180(11):1102-3. PubMed ID: 19468117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Cost-benefit analysis in the optimization of radiation protection. Ann ICRP; 1983; 10(2-3):1-75. PubMed ID: 6410952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Radiation exposure and the protection of the community. Gloag D Br Med J; 1980 Dec; 281(6254):1545-8. PubMed ID: 7437872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Radiation safety in the central radiopharmacy. Heller SL Semin Nucl Med; 1996 Apr; 26(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 8723505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Risk-based containment and air monitoring criteria for work with dispersible radioactive materials. Veluri VR; Justus AL Health Phys; 2013 Apr; 104(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 23439146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessment study for multi-barrier system used in radioactive borate waste isolation based on Monte Carlo simulations. Bayoumi TA; Reda SM; Saleh HM Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Jan; 70(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 21982736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A new approach to radiopharmacy waste. Lawlor C Health Estate; 2014 Sep; 68(8):69-73. PubMed ID: 25282990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Quality management system in the CIEMAT Radiation Dosimetry Service. Martín R; Navarro T; Romero AM; López MA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):111-4. PubMed ID: 21131328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility. Hoffman DE Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]