These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8570490)

  • 1. Cemented revision for femoral failure.
    Harris WH
    Orthopedics; 1995 Sep; 18(9):854-5. PubMed ID: 8570490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral reconstruction with morcelized bone graft and cemented stem.
    Ling RS
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 7614869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].
    Eingartner C; Ihm A; Maurer F; Volkmann R; Weise K; Weller S
    Unfallchirurg; 2002 Sep; 105(9):804-10. PubMed ID: 12232740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.
    Hernigou P; Dupuys N; Delambre J; Guissou I; Poignard A; Allain J; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 25231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High revision rate after treatment of femoral neck fractures with an optionally (un)cemented stem.
    Goosen JH; Mulder MC; Bongers KJ; Verheyen CC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jun; 129(6):801-5. PubMed ID: 18626652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The special problem of the replacement operation in cement-free prostheses].
    Decker S
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():477-80. PubMed ID: 3323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cemented and cement-free anchoring of total hip joint endoprostheses].
    Dsherov D
    Beitr Orthop Traumatol; 1987 Jun; 34(6):301-5. PubMed ID: 3632583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis and results following replacement surgery of loose, cemented hip endoprostheses].
    Ritschl P; Zweymüller K; Lukeschitsch G
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1986; 124(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 3751238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Goff TAJ; Bobak P
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless revision for femoral failure.
    Glassman AH; Engh CA
    Orthopedics; 1995 Sep; 18(9):851-3. PubMed ID: 8570489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral component fixation in the 1990s. Which system? A selection rationale.
    Mallory TH
    Orthopedics; 1995 Sep; 18(9):801-2. PubMed ID: 8570475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision of THR by PM-prostheses.
    Parhofer R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1986; 52(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 3788516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total hip replacement using the bias proximal porous-coated femoral component.
    Suominen S; Santavirta S
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1996; 85(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 9014065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size.
    Tyson Y; Hillman C; Majenburg N; Sköldenberg O; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Mohaddes M; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Apr; 92(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 33176549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a long stem cemented femoral component in revision total hip replacement: a follow-up study of five to 16 years.
    Te Stroet MA; Bronsema E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1207-13. PubMed ID: 25183592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which length for the revision stem?
    Toni A; Sudanese A; Bueno Lozano AL; Terzi S; Tabarroni M; Busanelli L; Innao V; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):319-31. PubMed ID: 7614871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data.
    Palan J; Smith MC; Gregg P; Mellon S; Kulkarni A; Tucker K; Blom AW; Murray DW; Pandit H
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 27694588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Special problem in the replacement operation in cemented prostheses].
    Hermichen HG; Weller S; Höntzsch D
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():471-5. PubMed ID: 3431257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.