These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8570786)

  • 1. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes.
    McAdams S; Winsberg S; Donnadieu S; De Soete G; Krimphoff J
    Psychol Res; 1995; 58(3):177-92. PubMed ID: 8570786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres.
    Lakatos S
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1426-39. PubMed ID: 11143454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of timbral analogies.
    McAdams S; Cunible JC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun; 336(1278):383-9. PubMed ID: 1354378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural processing of musical timbre by musicians, nonmusicians, and musicians possessing absolute pitch.
    Crummer GC; Walton JP; Wayman JW; Hantz EC; Frisina RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2720-7. PubMed ID: 8207143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation of stimuli for timbre perception studies.
    Labuschagne IB; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2256-67. PubMed ID: 23967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multidimensional scaling of synthetic musical timbre: perception of spectral and temporal characteristics.
    Samson S; Zatorre RJ; Ramsay JO
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1997 Dec; 51(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 9606948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Vuust P; Brattico E; Seppänen M; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1432-43. PubMed ID: 22414595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones.
    Caclin A; McAdams S; Smith BK; Winsberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):471-82. PubMed ID: 16119366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones.
    Elliott TM; Hamilton LS; Theunissen FE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):389-404. PubMed ID: 23297911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.
    Allen EJ; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1371-9. PubMed ID: 24606275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Musical training is not associated with spectral context effects in instrument sound categorization.
    Shorey AE; King CJ; Whiteford KL; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):991-1007. PubMed ID: 38216848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractionating auditory priors: A neural dissociation between active and passive experience of musical sounds.
    Kliuchko M; Brattico E; Gold BP; Tervaniemi M; Bogert B; Toiviainen P; Vuust P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216499. PubMed ID: 31051008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural, functional, and perceptual differences in Heschl's gyrus and musical instrument preference.
    Schneider P; Sluming V; Roberts N; Bleeck S; Rupp A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():387-94. PubMed ID: 16597790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J; Epstein M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):981-94. PubMed ID: 21060140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitch discrimination is better for synthetic timbre than natural musical instrument timbres despite familiarity.
    Holmes E; Kinghorn EE; McGarry LM; Busari E; Griffiths TD; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):31. PubMed ID: 35931555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidimensional scaling of musical time estimations.
    Cocenas-Silva R; Bueno JL; Molin P; Bigand E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 21853763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study.
    Caclin A; Giard MH; Smith BK; McAdams S
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():159-70. PubMed ID: 17261274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.