These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571089)

  • 1. Skin symptoms after the reduction of electric fields from visual display units.
    Oftedal G; Vistnes AI; Rygge K
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1995 Oct; 21(5):335-44. PubMed ID: 8571089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term effects on symptoms by reducing electric fields from visual display units.
    Oftedal G; Nyvang A; Moen BE
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1999 Oct; 25(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 10569461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of electric field reduction in visual display units on skin symptoms.
    Skulberg KR; Skyberg K; Eduard W; Goffeng LO; Vistnes AI; Levy F; Kjuus H
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 27(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11409597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial skin symptoms in visual display terminal (VDT) workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial, building- and VDT-related risk indicators.
    Stenberg B; Eriksson N; Mild KH; Höög J; Sandström M; Sundell J; Wall S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 24(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 8550278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin problems from visual display units. Provocation of skin symptoms under experimental conditions.
    Swanbeck G; Bleeker T
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1989; 69(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2563608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychosocial work environment and skin symptoms among visual display terminal workers: a case referent study.
    Eriksson N; Höög J; Mild KH; Sandström M; Stenberg B
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 26(6):1250-7. PubMed ID: 9447405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial skin symptoms in office workers. A five-year follow-up study.
    Eriksson N; Höög J; Sandström M; Stenberg B
    J Occup Environ Med; 1997 Feb; 39(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 9048316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual display units and facial rashes.
    Carmichael AJ; Roberts DL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jan; 26(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 1534740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clean rooms and itchy faces.
    Guest R
    J Soc Occup Med; 1991; 41(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 1826337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin problems in users of video display terminals. Discrepancy between subjective symptoms and objective signs.
    Lidén S; Berg M
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1991; 156():18-22. PubMed ID: 1828647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals.
    Stenberg B; Bergdahl J; Edvardsson B; Eriksson N; Lindén G; Widman L
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2002 Oct; 28(5):349-57. PubMed ID: 12432989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hypersensitivity reactions associated with electricity and computer terminals require serious measures].
    Stenberg B; Lidén C
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Dec; 96(48):5377-9. PubMed ID: 10612990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Skin diseases in computer terminal operators].
    Ettler K; Nozicková M
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1990; 33(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 2151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients with visual display unit-related facial symptoms are stingers.
    Berg M; Lonne-Rahm SB; Fischer T
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Jan; 78(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 9498026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin changes in "screen dermatitis" versus classical UV- and ionizing irradiation-related damage--similarities and differences.
    Gangi S; Johansson O
    Exp Dermatol; 1997 Dec; 6(6):283-91. PubMed ID: 9412815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful inhibition of allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone with topical glutathione.
    Isaksson M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Aug; 73(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 25891419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a questionnaire used in dermatological epidemiology. Discrepancy between self-reported symptoms and objective signs.
    Berg M
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1991; 156():13-7. PubMed ID: 1828646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screen dermatitis and visual display units].
    Spatari G; Sapienza D; Familiari A; Crimaldi R; Martino LB; Trifirò C; Fenga C; Cannavò S
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):846-7. PubMed ID: 18409994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the skin affected by work at visual display terminals?
    Wahlberg JE; Lidén C
    Dermatol Clin; 1988 Jan; 6(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 2968218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dermatological symptoms among visual display unit operators using plasma display and cathode ray tube screens.
    Koh D; Goh CL; Jeyaratnam J; Kee WC; Ong CN
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1990 Sep; 19(5):617-20. PubMed ID: 2148065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.