These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571271)
1. Order in the court. TEXPAC effort to reform state's highest court paying dividends. Ortolon K Tex Med; 1995 Nov; 91(11):31-3. PubMed ID: 8571271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The physician's role in the political process. Zuber TJ Mich Med; 1998 Jan; 97(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 9458673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preserving Do No Harm: Supreme Court Tosses Challenge to Medical Ethics Committee Law. Berlin J Tex Med; 2020 Feb; 116(2):22-23. PubMed ID: 32083712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 'No more pivotal election' in 1996. State Supreme Court holds liability reform in its hands. Sawhney KK Mich Med; 1996 Oct; 95(10):30-1. PubMed ID: 8937036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. The child in court: a subject review. Wolraich ML; Aceves J; Feldman HM; Hagan JF; Howard BJ; Navarro A; Richtsmeier AJ; Tolmas HC Pediatrics; 1999 Nov; 104(5 Pt 1):1145-8. PubMed ID: 10545564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection. Denniston L Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician and family court. Palmer RM N Y State J Med; 1978 Mar; 78(4):617-20. PubMed ID: 306080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hurricane Rita forces Texas physicians back into action. Ortolon K Tex Med; 2005 Nov; 101(11):65-6, 68. PubMed ID: 17094509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade. Mcfarlane DR Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New life for the death penalty. America (NY); 1982 Dec; 147(21):404. PubMed ID: 11658390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The physician's decision-making role in abortion cases. Marcin MJ; Marcin RB Jurist; 1975; 35(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 11664578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers. Bloche MG Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Building better oral health: a dental home for all Texans. Texas Dental Association Tex Dent J; 2008; Suppl():1-56. PubMed ID: 19363885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The physician in criminal court]. Durigon M Rev Prat; 2002 Apr; 52(7):743-5. PubMed ID: 12032961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases. Leiker M WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Court affirms physician's choice of abortion procedure. Stiller JA Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Oct; 8(10):10-2. PubMed ID: 10244309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Setting the Record Straight: Supreme Court Curtails TMB for Over-Sanctioning Physician. Berlin J Tex Med; 2019 Aug; 115(8):38-40. PubMed ID: 31369131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]