These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571271)

  • 21. The abortion decision.
    Drinan RF
    Commonweal; 1973 Feb; 97(19):438-40. PubMed ID: 11663380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Physicians are not bootleggers": the short, peculiar life of the Medicinal Alcohol Movement.
    Appel JM
    Bull Hist Med; 2008; 82(2):355-86. PubMed ID: 18622072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A class of their own.
    Ortolon K
    Tex Med; 2000 Jul; 96(7):43-5. PubMed ID: 10905115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion and medicine.
    Fortmann SP
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1975 Jan; 38(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11663542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Doctor as witness, doctor as juror. Going to court in a non-defendant, non-adversarial role.
    Summerlin HH
    N C Med J; 1995 Oct; 56(10):510-2. PubMed ID: 7477457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
    Jipping TL
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New Allies at the Capitol: TEXPAC Endorsements Help Bring Fresh Faces to Texas Legislature.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2019 Jan; 115(1):30-33. PubMed ID: 30811556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What the Court giveth: abortion and Bill C-43.
    Noonan SM
    Queens Law J; 1991; 16():321-45. PubMed ID: 11656415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The state's Dr. Death: what's unethical about physicians helping at executions?
    Davis M
    Soc Theory Pract; 1995; 21(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11654565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Border Battle.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2015 Nov; 111(11):57-60. PubMed ID: 26536518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. More thoughts on the physician's constitutional role in abortion and related choices.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 11659171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. California's Proposition 186: lessons from a single-payer health care reform ballot initiative campaign.
    Farey K; Lingappa VR
    J Public Health Policy; 1996; 17(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 8764388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Texas Supreme Court protects confidentiality of minutes of hospital meetings.
    Maroney JD; Barber WG
    Tex Med; 1977 Jul; 73(7):91-2. PubMed ID: 882928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Justices mull medical marijuana laws.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2003 Oct; 18(20):1. PubMed ID: 14626967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
    Cane MB
    Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Federal Court upholds corporate practice of medicine prohibition in Texas.
    Pickens A
    Tex Med; 1973 Dec; 69(12):121-2. PubMed ID: 4770585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medicine and the law: Texas Supreme Court refuses to extend "discovery rule" to malpractice suits alleging misdiagnosis.
    Tex Med; 1977 Aug; 73(8):110-1. PubMed ID: 882929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.