262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571621)
1. Stark self-referral rules burdened with complexities.
Barratt K; Katayama A
Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 8571621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining the impact of the new Stark rules on joint ventures.
Washlick JR
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Nov; 62(11):48-52. PubMed ID: 18990836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stark II: the quagmire thickens.
Ivers D
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Stark" reality: self-referral rule holds risk and opportunity.
Lebowitz PH
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 11680255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stark II proposed regulations. Impacting group practices and physician employers.
Wachler AB; Avery PA
Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10179373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II.
Gosfield AG
Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician group practice implications under the proposed Stark II regulations.
Sokolow DS
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Aug; ():6-9. PubMed ID: 10661984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stark rules. Purchases that pass muster.
Terry K
Med Econ; 2006 Dec; 83(24):44-6, 49. PubMed ID: 17249392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New Stark II rules on referrals will further restrict medical practices.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):96-8. PubMed ID: 10168642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes to the federal Stark law that affect diagnostic imaging arrangements.
Stirewalt K
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 20092174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are you missing out on a valuable profit center?
Jahn M
Med Econ; 1997 Jan; 74(1):115-6, 119-22. PubMed ID: 10164326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stark regulations: so much text; so little substance.
Conn L; Weissburg C
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(6):25-7, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10153032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices.
Larios D; Meyer A
Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules.
Portman RM; Lisa GC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers?
Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM
J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PHOs, IPAs members must comply with Stark regs.
Manag Care Strateg; 1998 Dec; 6(12):142-4. PubMed ID: 10351379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposed Stark II rules: clarification or more confusion?
Shay A; Francesconi G
J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):95-113. PubMed ID: 10186240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How the new Stark rules affect you.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 2008 Feb; 85(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 18314820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
