These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571621)
21. 4 tricky Stark law exceptions just got simpler. Med Health; 2006 Mar; 60(12):1, 4. PubMed ID: 16550939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stark: the key exceptions for group practices. Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Sep; ():4-10. PubMed ID: 11594198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Stark Act regulations: an overview. Becker S Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Apr; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 11345895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II. Katayama AC WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Shining a little light on the self-referral ban. Pretzer M Med Econ; 1998 Mar; 75(6):47-8, 52. PubMed ID: 10177630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ten myths about the Stark statute debunked. Gosfield AG J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 15018367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Stark II wants contribution plan installed before payment period begins. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Oct; 7(10):52-3. PubMed ID: 10185866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The final word--almost--on self-referral. Pretzer M Med Econ; 2001 Feb; 78(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 11252432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Not knowing the Stark lab rules can cost you big. Pretzer M Med Econ; 1996 Jan; 73(1):91-2, 94, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10153938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Deciphering the maze of Stark II regulations takes work. Physician Relat Update; 1998 Oct; 7(10):109-11. PubMed ID: 10345012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations. Davis JP Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stark II: division of profits comes under closer scrutiny. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 7(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10180805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience. Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Are cardiac-catheterization services Stark designated health services? Becker S; Kannensohn K Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Aug; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10173889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist; 2001 Jan; 66(3):856-965. PubMed ID: 11503745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Venturing into the Labyrinth of Stark: impact of Stark Law and Stark I regulations on integrated delivery systems. Weiser SJ J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(6):313-26, 372. PubMed ID: 10156296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]