262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571621)
21. 4 tricky Stark law exceptions just got simpler.
Med Health; 2006 Mar; 60(12):1, 4. PubMed ID: 16550939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Stark: the key exceptions for group practices.
Cassidy MA
Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Sep; ():4-10. PubMed ID: 11594198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Stark Act regulations: an overview.
Becker S
Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Apr; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 11345895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II.
Katayama AC
WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Shining a little light on the self-referral ban.
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 1998 Mar; 75(6):47-8, 52. PubMed ID: 10177630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ten myths about the Stark statute debunked.
Gosfield AG
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 15018367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Proposed safe harbor regulations clarify a few issues, leave others unresolved.
Saver RS
Healthspan; 1994 Oct; 11(9):20-2. PubMed ID: 10138489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1.
Riley J; Pristave R
Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Stark II wants contribution plan installed before payment period begins.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Oct; 7(10):52-3. PubMed ID: 10185866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The final word--almost--on self-referral.
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 2001 Feb; 78(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 11252432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Not knowing the Stark lab rules can cost you big.
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 1996 Jan; 73(1):91-2, 94, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10153938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Deciphering the maze of Stark II regulations takes work.
Physician Relat Update; 1998 Oct; 7(10):109-11. PubMed ID: 10345012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations.
Davis JP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stark II: division of profits comes under closer scrutiny.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 7(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10180805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Are cardiac-catheterization services Stark designated health services?
Becker S; Kannensohn K
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Aug; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10173889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 2001 Jan; 66(3):856-965. PubMed ID: 11503745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Venturing into the Labyrinth of Stark: impact of Stark Law and Stark I regulations on integrated delivery systems.
Weiser SJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(6):313-26, 372. PubMed ID: 10156296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
