262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571621)
41. Stark II final regulations: hot issues for physician practices.
Falk R; Hance A
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15523769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The new Stark regulations.
Homchick RG
J Cardiovasc Manag; 1995; 6(5):12-3, 29. PubMed ID: 10152481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Medicare program; physician self-referral regulations: change in date for submission of group attestation statement--HCFA. Final rule--technical amendment.
Fed Regist; 1995 Dec; 60(237):63438-40. PubMed ID: 10153534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Attack of the pods. CMS must stop explosion of physician office pathology labs.
Stoler M
Mod Healthc; 2010 Aug; 40(31):24. PubMed ID: 20726080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Surfing Stark II: prohibition against self-referrals.
Swibel HJ; Zaremski MJ
Physician Exec; 1995 Feb; 21(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 10140213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Stark Future for the Stark Law?
Collins A; Clark K; George A
Home Healthc Now; 2018; 36(6):393. PubMed ID: 30383600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The physician incentive plan rule: reevaluating physician compensation arrangements.
Gauvreau E
Manag Care Interface; 1997 Sep; 10(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 10175545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The Stark labyrinth. Navigating your way through fraud and abuse legislation.
Otrompke J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Nov; 32(11):46-50. PubMed ID: 11117002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Physician anti-referral legislation revisited.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Sep; 31(9):14. PubMed ID: 10621381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers.
Riley JB; Pristave RJ
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Stark II: don't underestimate the feds' resolve to enforce it.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 May; 7(5):55-7. PubMed ID: 10180142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Push is on to exempt POLs from the burdens of CLIA.
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Nov; 29(11):18. PubMed ID: 10174094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The new Stark II regulations: do you still comply?
Hirsch WR
J Cardiovasc Manag; 1998; 9(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 10178724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. New Stark regs threaten groups' ties to independent physicians.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1995 Dec; 4(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 10153805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A physician's guide to Stark rules.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 15357172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Reinventing government: promise--and Stark reality.
Doherty RB
Internist; 1995 Oct; 36(9):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10151914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships.
Avery PA; Wachler AB
Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Can it be--Pete Stark, the doctor's pal?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Stark P
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10338829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
