These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8571621)
61. CMS shines up its 'shoes'. Stark revisions ease tensions on self-referrals. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(34):17. PubMed ID: 18800481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals. Wales SD Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Stark realities for hospitals. Reynolds M Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Sep; 58(9):50-5. PubMed ID: 15460937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. AHA pushes CMS' button. Association rehashes opposition to self-referral. DoBias M Mod Healthc; 2006 Jun; 36(25):16. PubMed ID: 16827471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Downsizing an office practice to counter rising costs and reduced net income. MacPhail J CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):849-52. PubMed ID: 8087761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2008 Jan; 22(1):42-3, 56. PubMed ID: 18271439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Is the Stark law necessary? An interview with a health law expert. Interview by Joan Naper. Gaynor JM Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Oct; 14(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10152541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Physician compensation arrangements under Stark proposed rule. Cassidy M Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Mar; ():3-7. PubMed ID: 10177820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. New Stark Phase III Regulations: The Impact and Changes. Travis NL; Wool HS; Finnegan JH J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 18242531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility. Chase L Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Stark II regulations anticipated. Kannensohn K Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Jul; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 10161644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Centers for medicare and medicaid now scrutinizing leasing arrangements. Travis NL; Wool HS; Chananie SJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):683-5. PubMed ID: 17903751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. HCFA implementation of Stark II law examines motive in payment review. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Aug; 7(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 10182585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. FAHS refers Stark II reactions to HCFA. Gogal L Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):4. PubMed ID: 10185365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. HCFA makes concession on 'Stark I' exemptions. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):48. PubMed ID: 10152138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. ASCP opposes CMS on pod labs, signature requirement. Stoler MH MLO Med Lab Obs; 2010 Oct; 42(10):46. PubMed ID: 21090058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Kahn: physician-owned limited service facilities "getting in under the wire". Hosp Outlook; 2004; 7(4):1, 4. PubMed ID: 15552254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]