These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8572021)

  • 1. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates.
    Mongelli M; Wilcox M; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 8572021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy.
    Gardosi J; Vanner T; Francis A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 9236643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch.
    Thorsell M; Kaijser M; Almström H; Andolf E
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 18333938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
    Wessel H; Nyberg T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction policy and missed post-term pregnancies: a mathematical model.
    Mongelli M; Wong YC; Venkat A; Chua TM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 41(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 11284644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.
    Savitz DA; Terry JW; Dole N; Thorp JM; Siega-Riz AM; Herring AH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1660-6. PubMed ID: 12501080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of pregnancy dating methods commonly used in South Africa: a prospective study.
    Geerts L; Poggenpoel E; Theron G
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jun; 103(8):552-6. PubMed ID: 23885738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment adjusted for gestational age in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome.
    Gardosi J; Mongelli M
    BMJ; 1993 Jun; 306(6891):1509-11. PubMed ID: 8518678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.
    Lynch CD; Zhang J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():86-96. PubMed ID: 17803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Down syndrome and neural tube defect screening: the value of using gestational age by ultrasonography.
    Benn PA; Borgida A; Horne D; Briganti S; Collins R; Rodis JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 176(5):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9166168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Calculation of gestational age. Methods and problems].
    Matias A; Tiago P; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2002; 15(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12025447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How well does fetal ultrasound predict the date of birth in Antigua and Barbuda?
    Martin TC; Miles RL; Edwards K
    West Indian Med J; 2005 Mar; 54(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15999882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the date of confinement.
    Hutchon DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):510-1. PubMed ID: 8765286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study to compare serum human placental lactogen and menstrual dates for determining gestational age.
    Whittaker PG; Lind T; Lawson JY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 156(1):178-82. PubMed ID: 3541617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic misclassification of gestational age by ultrasound biometry: implications for clinical practice and research methodology in the Nordic countries.
    Skalkidou A; Kullinger M; Georgakis MK; Kieler H; Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):440-444. PubMed ID: 29352467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of gestational age estimated by menstrual dating in women seeking abortion beyond nine weeks.
    Norman WV; Bergunder J; Eccles L
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Mar; 33(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 21453565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dating Ultrasounds are Fundamental to Modern Obstetric Care.
    Mohamed M; McCormick CA; Foo A; Meaney S; O' Donoghue K
    Ir Med J; 2022 Apr; 115(4):582. PubMed ID: 35695731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Birth weight, prematurity and accuracy of gestational age.
    Mongelli M; Gardosi J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Mar; 56(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 9127157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Naegele's rule: a reappraisal.
    Baskett TF; Nagele F
    BJOG; 2000 Nov; 107(11):1433-5. PubMed ID: 11117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.