BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8572121)

  • 61. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response.
    Sininger YS; Abdala C; Cone-Wesson B
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 9119764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Auditory brainstem responses in young adults with Down syndrome.
    Widen JE; Folsom RC; Thompson G; Wilson WR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Mar; 91(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 2952010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of Pure-Tone Thresholds and Cochlear Microphonics Thresholds in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients.
    Coulthurst S; Nachman AJ; Murray MT; Koka K; Saoji AA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1320-1326. PubMed ID: 32332587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Response thresholds in electrocochleography and their relation to the pure tone audiogram.
    Schoonhoven R; Prijs VF; Grote JJ
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 8807268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.
    Stapells DR; Oates P
    Audiol Neurootol; 1997; 2(5):257-80. PubMed ID: 9390836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of a zinc-deficient diet on hearing in CBA mice.
    Kang WS; Lim HW; Suh JK; Chung JW
    Neuroreport; 2012 Mar; 23(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 22209802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The prognostic value of electrocochleography in severely hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 1999; 38(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 10437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Auditory brainstem responses and extratympanic electrocochleography. A threshold comparison in children.
    Fjermedal O; Laukli E; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 3232025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Auditory evoked potentials in the Japanese monkey.
    Kamada T; Kameda K; Kojima S
    J Med Primatol; 1991 Aug; 20(6):284-9. PubMed ID: 1757970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited.
    Minaya C; Atcherson SR
    Audiol Res; 2015 Jan; 5(1):105. PubMed ID: 26557358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Input/output curves to tone bursts and clicks in extratympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography.
    Schoonhoven R; Fabius MA; Grote JJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):619-30. PubMed ID: 8747811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Circadian variation in the latency of auditory brainstem response].
    Murakami S; Sotsu M; Nakamura N
    No To Shinkei; 1992 Jul; 44(7):615-20. PubMed ID: 1329888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A combination antioxidant therapy prevents age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6 mice.
    Heman-Ackah SE; Juhn SK; Huang TC; Wiedmann TS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Sep; 143(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 20723783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Basis and some diagnostic implications of electrocochleography.
    Naunton RF; Zerlin S
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Apr; 86(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 177832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effects of stimulus duration on ABR and behavioral thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Beauchaine KA; Reiland JK; Worthington DW; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):616-9. PubMed ID: 6481001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A comparison of extratympanic versus transtympanic recordings in electrocochleography.
    Noguchi Y; Nishida H; Komatsuzaki A
    Audiology; 1999; 38(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 10437684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Threshold Estimation Using "Chained Stimuli" for Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Individuals With Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment.
    Kalaiah MK; Poovaiah S; Shastri U
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):428-436. PubMed ID: 31461333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. III. Low-frequency responses and repetition rate effects.
    Boettcher FA; White DR; Mills JH; Schmiedt BN
    Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):208-19. PubMed ID: 8567437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Relationship between the auditory brainstem response and auditory nerve thresholds in cats with hearing loss.
    Ngan EM; May BJ
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 11377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Audiograms derived from the brain stem response.
    Mitchell C; Clemis JD
    Laryngoscope; 1977 Dec; 87(12):2016-22. PubMed ID: 926965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.