These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8572423)

  • 1. On the influence of volume currents and extended sources on neuromagnetic fields: a simulation study.
    Haueisen J; Ramon C; Czapski P; Eiselt M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1995; 23(6):728-39. PubMed ID: 8572423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
    Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of the MEG on dipole orientation in the rabbit head.
    Melcher JR; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 70(5):460-72. PubMed ID: 2460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
    Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain.
    Konn D; Gowland P; Bowtell R
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jul; 50(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 12815677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-resolution EEG source localization in personalized segmentation-free head model with multi-dipole fitting.
    Hirata A; Niitsu M; Phang CR; Kodera S; Kida T; Rashed EA; Fukunaga M; Sadato N; Wasaka T
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38306964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MEG and EEG dipole clusters from extended cortical sources.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Tech R; Wagner M; Gasca F
    Biomed Eng Lett; 2017 Aug; 7(3):185-191. PubMed ID: 30603165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2303269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Head model extension for the study of bioelectric phenomena.
    Bruno P; Vatta F; Mininel S; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():59-64. PubMed ID: 12724869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model.
    Lütkenhöner B; Menninghaus E; Steinsträter O; Wienbruch C; Gissler HM; Elbert T
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 7(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 7577327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simulation study of the error in dipole source localization for EEG spikes with a realistic head model.
    Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Oka M; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 114(6):1069-78. PubMed ID: 12804675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.