These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8574049)

  • 1. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Fagan LL; Shellock FG; Brenner RJ; Rothman B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(5):614-6. PubMed ID: 8574049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for a breast tissue expander with a remote port.
    Linnemeyer H; Shellock FG; Ahn CY
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue expanders and magnetic resonance imaging: the "hot" breast implant.
    Duffy FJ; May JW
    Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Dec; 35(6):647-9. PubMed ID: 8748349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of the magnetic resonance field on breast tissue expanders.
    Nava MB; Bertoldi S; Forti M; Catanuto G; Vergnaghi D; Altomare L; Tanzi MC; Farè S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):901-7. PubMed ID: 22660980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging and vascular access ports: ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Nogueira M; Morisoli S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 7549216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR imaging and cervical fixation devices: evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(9):1093-8. PubMed ID: 9071001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of MRI on breast tissue expanders and recommendations for safe use.
    Marano AA; Henderson PW; Prince MR; Dashnaw SM; Rohde CH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Dec; 70(12):1702-1707. PubMed ID: 29046262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vascular access ports and catheters: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 8782183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts produced by heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(5):756-8. PubMed ID: 7981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.
    Kumar R; Lerski RA; Gandy S; Clift BA; Abboud RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1799-802. PubMed ID: 16838376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infusion port dislodgement of bilateral breast tissue expanders after MRI.
    Zegzula HD; Lee WP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 46(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 11192033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2001; 3(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 11777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1417-9. PubMed ID: 10227529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.
    Gill A; Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 22230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8180463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro assessment of 3-T MRI issues for a bioabsorbable, coronary artery scaffold with metallic markers.
    Shellock FG; Giangarra CJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 32(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24315524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weight Measurement and Volumetric Displacement of Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders: Why Port and Shell Volumes Matter in Breast Reconstruction, Augmentation, and Revision.
    Wenzel CG; Wacholtz WF; Janssen DA; Bengtson BP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):481-91. PubMed ID: 26408438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical external immobilization devices: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues at 3.0 Tesla.
    Diaz FL; Tweardy L; Shellock FG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 20110847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.