141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8574199)
1. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Vickers DA
Br J Audiol; 1995 Jun; 29(3):131-43. PubMed ID: 8574199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2050-62. PubMed ID: 8227747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Nejime Y; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):603-15. PubMed ID: 9228821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
Johnson EE; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).
Manohar S; Spoth J; Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Salvi R
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():197-203. PubMed ID: 28705607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss.
Nejime Y; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):572-6. PubMed ID: 9440342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Busby PA; Arora K
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Wojtczak M; Gudgin E
Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9307821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
Konopka W; Olszewski J
Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.
Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Ding D; Liu X; Chen GD; Salvi R
Neuroscience; 2019 Dec; 422():212-227. PubMed ID: 31669363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss.
Moore BC; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Baer T
Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):227-45. PubMed ID: 9307819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
Hansen M
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early age noise exposure increases loudness perception - A novel animal model of hyperacusis.
Alkharabsheh A; Xiong F; Xiong B; Manohar S; Chen G; Salvi R; Sun W
Hear Res; 2017 Apr; 347():11-17. PubMed ID: 27746216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
