These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8574302)

  • 1. Differences in phonetogram features between male and female subjects with and without vocal training.
    Sulter AM; Schutte HK; Miller DG
    J Voice; 1995 Dec; 9(4):363-77. PubMed ID: 8574302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice characteristics of children aged between 6 and 13 years: impact of age, gender, and vocal training.
    Pribuisiene R; Uloza V; Kardisiene V
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):150-5. PubMed ID: 21449635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superimposition of speaking voice characteristics and phonetograms in untrained and trained vocal groups.
    Awan SN
    J Voice; 1993 Mar; 7(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8353617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A longitudinal pilot study on phonetograms/voice profiles in pre-pubertal choir boys.
    Pedersen MF
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1993 Dec; 18(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 8877226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Value of the relative phonetogram (RP) for the evaluation of organic dysphonias].
    Hilgenheger C; Sarfati J; Reyt E; Sittel C; Eckel HE
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 10668357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A structured approach to voice range profile (phonetogram) analysis.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP; Schutte HK; Miller DG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1076-85. PubMed ID: 7823554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects on vocal range and voice quality of singing voice training: the classically trained female voice.
    Pabon P; Stallinga R; Södersten M; Ternström S
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 24084360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonetogram changes for trained singers over a nine-month period of vocal training.
    LeBorgne WD; Weinrich BD
    J Voice; 2002 Mar; 16(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 12002885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of post-loading rest on acoustic parameters with special reference to gender and ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(6):338-50. PubMed ID: 11721140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Acoustic analysis of the voice in singing children].
    Shilenkova VV; Korotchenko VV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2010; (1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20436424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The voice of the singer in the phonetogram].
    Klingholz F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jan; 68(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 2915591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonetograms, aerodynamic measurements, self-evaluations, and auditory perceptual ratings of male-to-female transsexual voice.
    Holmberg EB; Oates J; Dacakis G; Grant C
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):511-22. PubMed ID: 19766444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of trained and untrained rabindrasangeet singers.
    Chatterjee I; Kumar S; Chattopadhyay D
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 64(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 24294579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of professionally trained versus untrained voices.
    Siupsinskiene N
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2003; 39(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 12576764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized laryngeal videostroboscopic rating: differences between untrained and trained male and female subjects, and effects of varying sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
    Sulter AM; Schutte HK; Miller DG
    J Voice; 1996 Jun; 10(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 8734393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional phonetographic assessment of voice performance in professional and non-professional speakers.
    Neuschaefer-Rube C; Sram F; Klajman S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 9197092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measuring the voice field in general ENT practice. How, when, why?].
    Reker U
    HNO; 1990 Oct; 38(10):349-54. PubMed ID: 2283327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectrum factors relevant to phonetogram measurement.
    Gramming P; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2352-60. PubMed ID: 3411026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vocal efficiency parameters in children and adolescents: effect of physical development and singing activity].
    Fuchs M; Heide S; Hentschel B; Gelbrich G; Makuch A; Thiel S; Täschner R; Dietz A
    HNO; 2006 Dec; 54(12):971-80. PubMed ID: 16091907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.