These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8575159)

  • 1. Effect of sampling frequencies and averaging resolution on medical parameters of auditory brainstem responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M
    Comput Biol Med; 1995 Sep; 25(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 8575159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem responses recorded at fast stimulation rates using maximum length sequences.
    Thornton AR; Slaven A
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Jun; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 8241969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus phase on the latency of the auditory brainstem response.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jan; 2(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1768866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of auditory brainstem responses.
    Grönfors T
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1993 May; 32(3-4):171-9. PubMed ID: 8514435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computerized audiometry. Analysis and modeling of brain stem evoked auditory potentials].
    Fraczkowski K
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1990; 44(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 2084607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A time-frequency feature extraction scheme for the automated detection of binaural interaction in auditory brainstem responses.
    Delb W; Strauss DJ; Plinkert PK
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 15035559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.
    Skoe E; Nicol T; Kraus N
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Mar; 196(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 21277896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peak identification of auditory brainstem responses with multi-filters and attributed automaton.
    Grönfors T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1993 Jun; 40(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8370281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neonatology: the method and results in a group of normal newborns].
    Pasanisi E; Bacciu S; Fava G; Dallatomasina M; Bacciu A; Negri M; Piazza F; Montali S
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1996; 67(5-6):191-5. PubMed ID: 10021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancy between auditory brainstem responses, auditory steady-state responses, and auditory behavior in two patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease.
    Tanaka M; Hamano S; Sakata H; Adachi N; Kaga K; Osaka H; Kurosawa K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Sep; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 18029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Auditory brainstem responses evoked by direct mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain. Objective preoperative testing of candidates for implantable hearing aids].
    Hoth S; Lohaus M; Waldmann B
    HNO; 2003 Jul; 51(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 12904876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Threshold prediction in adults with normal hearing using ASSR, Tb-ABR and c-ABR: a within-subject comparison].
    Wu Y; Wu H; Li Y; Zhang J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 23(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 19441242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Refining the audiological assessment in children using narrow-band CE-Chirp-evoked auditory steady state responses.
    Venail F; Artaud JP; Blanchet C; Uziel A; Mondain M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 25036002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparisons among three frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing adults].
    Chen F; Fan LH; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Dong DA
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 22619803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 'neural' response with 3-ms latency evoked by loud sound in profoundly deaf patients.
    Kato T; Shiraishi K; Eura Y; Shibata K; Sakata T; Morizono T; Soda T
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 9644537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Furuse H; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Yokota M; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():15-22. PubMed ID: 8203219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.