These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8575675)

  • 1. [A quantitative analysis of uterine contraction during labor].
    Redźko S; Boliński J; Urban J
    Ginekol Pol; 1995 Feb; 66(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 8575675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of wavelet transform to uterine electromyographic signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes.
    Eswaran H; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H; Lowery CL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Mar; 11(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 12380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External four-channel tocography during delivery.
    Spätling L; Fallenstein F; Danders R; Hasenburg A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 Sep; 46(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 7805998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
    Dowdle MA
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contractions: Traditional concepts and their role in modern obstetrics.
    Gee SE; Frey HA
    Semin Perinatol; 2020 Mar; 44(2):151218. PubMed ID: 31843206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antepartum uterine activity characteristics differentiating true from threatened preterm labor.
    Newman RB; Richmond GS; Winston YE; Hamer C; Katz M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1 Suppl):39S-41S. PubMed ID: 2359577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine activity monitoring during labor.
    Bakker PC; Van Rijswijk S; van Geijn HP
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 18052832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prognostic value of chosen parameters of mechanical and bioelectrical uterine activity in prediction of threatening preterm labour].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19382611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A node-wise analysis of the uterine muscle networks for pregnancy monitoring.
    Nader N; Hassan M; Falou W; Marque C; Khalil M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():712-715. PubMed ID: 28268427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
    Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical assessment: visual or digital?
    Morgan MA; de Veciana M; Rumney PJ; Schlinke S
    J Perinatol; 1996; 16(2 Pt 1):103-6. PubMed ID: 8732556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Maternal and fetal blood flow profile in labor].
    Weiss E
    Gynakologe; 1992 Oct; 25(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 1468712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Significance of single lead external tocography in the study of uterine contractions in labor].
    VEDRA B; HORSKY J
    Cesk Gynekol; 1956 Feb; 21(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 13316862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.