These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 857603)

  • 1. Discrimination of frequency ramps in subjects with cochlear hearing loss.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(3-4):310-6. PubMed ID: 857603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thresholds for linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(3-4):317-27. PubMed ID: 857604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory processing of frequency ramps.
    Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 921606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps in subjects with cochlear lesions.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(3-4):213-9. PubMed ID: 906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage.
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Collet L
    Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):524-37. PubMed ID: 11872610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency discrimination in ears with and without contralateral cochlear dead regions.
    Heggdal PO; Lind O; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):553-7. PubMed ID: 23786393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutation of OPA1 gene causes deafness by affecting function of auditory nerve terminals.
    Huang T; Santarelli R; Starr A
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():97-104. PubMed ID: 19733158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.
    Strömberg AK; Olofsson Å; Westin M; Duan M; Stenfelt S
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():43-49. PubMed ID: 26724755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1976 Dec; 98(4):412-24. PubMed ID: 998292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Bicciolo G; Ruscito P; Rizzo S; Frenguelli A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 8209689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing investigation in relation to the duration of acoustic signals.
    Abramovich SJ
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Feb; 88(2 Pt 1):334-41. PubMed ID: 621999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with psychogenic hearing loss.
    Oishi N; Inoue Y; Hori A; Yakushimaru R; Kohno N; Ogawa K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 21254959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Frequency-dependent cochlear microphonics in inner ear hearing loss with various pitch thresholds].
    Marangos N; Hesse G; Mausolf A
    HNO; 1989 Jan; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 2917880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.