These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576483)

  • 21. Super-resolution reconstruction for 4D computed tomography of the lung via the projections onto convex sets approach.
    Zhang Y; Wu X; Yang W; Feng Q; Chen W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111917. PubMed ID: 25370650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interpolation artifacts in multimodality image registration based on maximization of mutual information.
    Tsao J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):854-64. PubMed ID: 12906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurements from 3D reconstructed multi-directional views using phantom data set on MRA image sequence.
    Kim DY; Park JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18619751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A hybrid metal artifact reduction algorithm for x-ray CT.
    Zhang Y; Yan H; Jia X; Yang J; Jiang SB; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041910. PubMed ID: 23556904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-time ultrasonic scan conversion via linear interpolation of oversampled vectors.
    Richard WD; Arthur RM
    Ultrason Imaging; 1994 Apr; 16(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 7974907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A projection-based image registration algorithm and its application.
    Chen H; Yao D; Li R; Chen W
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 16193266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Normalized metal artifact reduction in head and neck computed tomography.
    Lell MM; Meyer E; Kuefner MA; May MS; Raupach R; Uder M; Kachelriess M
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jul; 47(7):415-21. PubMed ID: 22659592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast scan conversion algorithms for displaying ultrasound sector images.
    Berkhoff AP; Huisman HJ; Thijssen JM; Jacobs EM; Homan RJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 1994 Apr; 16(2):87-108. PubMed ID: 7974911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review.
    Prokop M; Shin HO; Schanz A; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(2):433-51. PubMed ID: 9084083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cone beam volume CT image artifacts caused by defective cells in x-ray flat panel imagers and the artifact removal using a wavelet-analysis-based algorithm.
    Tang X; Ning R; Yu R; Conover D
    Med Phys; 2001 May; 28(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 11393477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accelerating phase contrast MR angiography by simplified skipped phase encoding and edge deghosting with array coil enhancement.
    Chang Z; Xiang QS; Shen H; Ji J; Yin FF
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1247-52. PubMed ID: 22380356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms.
    Mallouhi A; Schocke M; Judmaier W; Wolf C; Dessl A; Czermak BV; Waldenberger P; Jaschke WR
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 11997561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring polynomial based interpolation schemes for photoacoustic tomographic image reconstruction.
    Paul A; Warbal P; Mukherjee A; Paul S; Saha RK
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34874307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new adaptive interpolation algorithm for 3D ultrasound imaging with speckle reduction and edge preservation.
    Huang Q; Zheng Y; Lu M; Wang T; Chen S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 19117725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Centroid-based maximum intensity projections.
    Cash DM; Palmisano MG; Galloway RL
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2002; 26(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11801907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of phase-difference and complex-difference processing in phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Bernstein MA; Ikezaki Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 1823179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intracranial vessel segmentation from time-of-flight MRA using pre-processing of the MIP Z-buffer: accuracy of the ZBS algorithm.
    Chapman BE; Stapelton JO; Parker DL
    Med Image Anal; 2004 Jun; 8(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 15063861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computed tomographic metal artifact reduction for the detection and quantitation of small features near large metallic implants: a comparison of published methods.
    Rinkel J; Dillon WP; Funk T; Gould R; Prevrhal S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 18664852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 3D multi-scale vessel enhancement filtering based on curvature measurements: application to time-of-flight MRA.
    Chapman BE; Parker DL
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Jun; 9(3):191-208. PubMed ID: 15854841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.