249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576489)
1. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging.
Gilles R; Guinebretière JM; Lucidarme O; Cluzel P; Janaud G; Finet JF; Tardivon A; Masselot J; Vanel D
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 8184038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnosis of infraclinical lesions of the breast with dynamic MRI: results of a prospective and multicenter study].
Gilles R; Meunier M; Trouffléau P; Divano L; Tardivon A; Vanel D; Hacourt A; Neuenschwander S; Stinès J
J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 78(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 9239364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?
Westerhof JP; Fischer U; Moritz JD; Oestmann JW
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 9609890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited value of scintimammography and contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of microcalcification detected by mammography.
Tiling R; Khalkhali I; Sommer H; Linke R; Moser R; Willemsen F; Pfluger T; Tatsch K; Hahn K
Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Jan; 19(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 9515547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation.
Gilles R; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Tardivon AA; Rochard F; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 7617854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions using the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) system: critical evaluation of indication strategies].
Wedegärtner U; Otto U; Buitrago-Tellez C; Bremerich J; Oertli D; Torhorst J; Bongartz G
Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 11293864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
