54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576489)
1. Effect of Radiofrequency Transmit Field Correction on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast at 3.0 T.
Bedair R; Graves MJ; Patterson AJ; McLean MA; Manavaki R; Wallace T; Reid S; Mendichovszky I; Griffiths J; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 26579563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast Media-Enhanced Breast Computed Tomography With a Photon-Counting Detector: Initial Experiences on In Vivo Image Quality and Correlation to Histology.
Berger N; Marcon M; Wieler J; Vorburger D; Dedes KJ; Frauenfelder T; Varga Z; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2022 Oct; 57(10):704-709. PubMed ID: 35220384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions.
Drew PJ; Turnbull LW; Chatterjee S; Read J; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Monson JR; Kerin MJ
Ann Surg; 1999 Nov; 230(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 10561092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses.
Tao Z; Qi H; Ma Y
Am J Transl Res; 2023; 15(4):2870-2877. PubMed ID: 37193163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of a spiral breast computed tomography system equipped with photon counting detector technology in patients with implants: An observational study of our initial experiences.
Ruby L; Shim S; Berger N; Marcon M; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(30):e20797. PubMed ID: 32791669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.
Hrkac Pustahija A; Ivanac G; Brkljacic B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Jul; 24(4):187-194. PubMed ID: 30091708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of breast cancer from fibroadenoma with dual-echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Wang S; Delproposto Z; Wang H; Ding X; Ji C; Wang B; Xu M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67731. PubMed ID: 23844077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3-5 BI-RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MRI and Histological Findings.
Fiaschetti V; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Cossu E; Arganini C; Salimbeni C; Scarano AL; Arduini S; Simonetti G
ISRN Oncol; 2011; 2011():643890. PubMed ID: 22084735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Korean J Radiol; 2010; 11(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 20191065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.
Jansen SA; Paunesku T; Fan X; Woloschak GE; Vogt S; Conzen SD; Krausz T; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 19864527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?
Akita A; Tanimoto A; Jinno H; Kameyama K; Kuribayashi S
Eur Radiol; 2009 Sep; 19(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 19350244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?
Sardanelli F; Bacigalupo L; Carbonaro L; Esseridou A; Giuseppetti GM; Panizza P; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 2008 Apr; 113(3):439-51. PubMed ID: 18414812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should we use MRI to screen women at high-risk of breast cancer?
Gilbert FJ
Cancer Imaging; 2005 May; 5(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16154817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current applications and future direction of MR mammography.
Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW; Drew PJ
Br J Cancer; 2003 Jan; 88(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 12556951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Viehweg P; Lampe D; Buchmann J; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
MAGMA; 2000 Dec; 11(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 11154954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
