These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576533)
1. Clinical implications of intra- and inter-reader agreement in four different automated visual fields. Alexander LJ; Corliss DA; Vinson C; Williams J; Casser L; Fingeret M; Malinovsky V; Townsend JC J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):681-92. PubMed ID: 8576533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry. Sihota R; Gupta V; Tuli D; Sharma A; Sony P; Srinivasan G J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17224765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study. Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry. Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the subjective determination of glaucomatous visual field progression. Tanna AP; Bandi JR; Budenz DL; Feuer WJ; Feldman RM; Herndon LW; Rhee DJ; Whiteside-de Vos J Ophthalmology; 2011 Jan; 118(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 20723992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Katz J Ophthalmology; 1999 Feb; 106(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 9951496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Vasile C; Boehm AG; Sejnowski T; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2660-5. PubMed ID: 12147600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice. Demirel S; Johnson CA J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]