These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576663)

  • 61. False-positive amphetamine results on several drug screening platforms due to mexiletine.
    Snozek CLH; Kaleta EJ; Jannetto PJ; Linkenmeyer JJ; Harnish TL; Stephen J; Langman LJ
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Aug; 58():125-127. PubMed ID: 29802836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Methylphenidate produces a false-positive urine amphetamine screen.
    Manzi S; Law T; Shannon MW
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2002 Oct; 18(5):401. PubMed ID: 12395015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Immunoassay methods used to diagnose patients poisoned with psychoactive substances--analytical and interpretation problems].
    Gomółka E; Hydzik P; Madej T; Łata S; Rojek S
    Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(8):629-31. PubMed ID: 23243950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Experience of a laboratory service for drug screening in urine.
    Simpson D; Greenwood J; Jarvie DR; Moore FM
    Scott Med J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 8451622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A discussion of "Method comparison of EMIT II and OnLine with RIA for drug screening," (J. Forensic Sci., Vol. 38, No. 6, Nov. 1993, pp. 1326-1341).
    Smith FP
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jul; 39(4):909-11. PubMed ID: 8064276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Accuracy of common drug screen tests.
    Schwartz JG; Zollars PR; Okorodudu AO; Carnahan JJ; Wallace JE; Briggs JE
    Am J Emerg Med; 1991 Mar; 9(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 1994947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Tissue distribution of amphetamine isomers in a fatal overdose.
    Meyer E; Van Bocxlaer JF; Dirinck IM; Lambert WE; Thienpont L; De Leenheer AP
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 9171211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Amphetamine detection during toxicology screening of a university medical center patient population.
    Bailey DN
    J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 1987; 25(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 3323543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Reagent lot-to-lot variability in sensitivity for amphetamine with the Syva Emit II Monoclonal Amphetamine/Methamphetamine assay.
    Singh J
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 9083839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Methods and clinical experiences with a thin-layer chromatography procedure for the detection of drugs in human urine (Drug-screen)].
    Kramer D; Oellerich M; Helmstaedt D; May B
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1974; 80():1551-3. PubMed ID: 4156111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. False-positive EMIT indication of opiates and methadone in a doxylamine intoxication.
    Hausmann E; Kohl B; von Boehmer H; Wellhöner HH
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1983 Oct; 21(10):599-600. PubMed ID: 6358402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Screening for drugs in forensic blood samples using EMIT urine assays.
    Gjerde H; Christophersen AS; Skuterud B; Klemetsen K; Mørland J
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Feb; 44(2-3):179-85. PubMed ID: 2180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Efficacy of DRIVEN-FLOW® M7-II, a new on-site drug screening kit in postmortem urine compared with Triage DOA®.
    Tanaka T; Yoshizumi S; Kasai K; Yoshida K; Sato H
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101804. PubMed ID: 33152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A Case of False-positive Amphetamine Results on Urine Toxicology Testing Secondary to Imatinib.
    Meyers S; Wachman EM
    J Addict Med; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 15(4):349-351. PubMed ID: 33181576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Development of a latex agglutination inhibition reaction test for amphetamines in urine.
    Mongkolsirichaikul D; Tarnchompoo B; Ratanabanangkoon K
    J Immunol Methods; 1993 Jan; 157(1-2):189-95. PubMed ID: 8423362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Specificity of the Abbott TDx assay for amphetamine in post mortem urine samples.
    Kintz P; Tracqui A; Mangin P; Lugnier A; Chaumont A
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1989; 39(2):461-3. PubMed ID: 2535395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Can tapentadol cause a false-positive urine drug screen result for amphetamine?
    Tang S; Mullins ME; Braun BM; Hock KG; Scott MG; Guarino AH; Brasington RD
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2012 Dec; 50(10):1174-5. PubMed ID: 23088194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The incidence of amphetamine use among truck drivers from various regions of Thailand.
    Mongkolsirichaikul D; Mokkhavesa C; Ratanabanangkoon K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1988 Sep; 71(9):471-4. PubMed ID: 3249178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Which amphetamine-type stimulants can be detected by oral fluid immunoassays?
    Souza DZ; Boehl PO; Comiran E; Prusch DS; Zancanaro I; Fuentefria AM; Pechansky F; Duarte PC; De Boni RB; Fröehlich PE; Limberger RP
    Ther Drug Monit; 2012 Feb; 34(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 22249346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Direct automated EMIT d.a.u. analysis of N,N-dimethylformamide-modified serum, plasma, and postmortem blood for amphetamines, barbiturates, methadone, methaqualone, phencyclidine, and propoxyphene.
    Klinger RA; Blum LM; Rieders F
    J Anal Toxicol; 1990; 14(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 2263063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.