These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8576692)

  • 1. Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route.
    Gallistel CR; Cramer AE
    J Exp Biol; 1996 Jan; 199(Pt 1):211-7. PubMed ID: 8576692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks.
    Etienne AS; Maurer R; Séguinot V
    J Exp Biol; 1996 Jan; 199(Pt 1):201-9. PubMed ID: 8576691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The medial frontal cortex contributes to but does not organize rat exploratory behavior.
    Blankenship PA; Stuebing SL; Winter SS; Cheatwood JL; Benson JD; Whishaw IQ; Wallace DG
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 336():1-11. PubMed ID: 27590266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blurring of the senses: common cues for distance perception in diverse sensory systems.
    Lewis JE; Maler L
    Neuroscience; 2002; 114(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12207951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain.
    Vallortigara G; Pagni P; Sovrano VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 15072675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A video demonstration of preserved piloting by scent tracking but impaired dead reckoning after fimbria-fornix lesions in the rat.
    Whishaw IQ; Gorny BP
    J Vis Exp; 2009 Apr; (26):. PubMed ID: 19398947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system.
    McNaughton BL; Barnes CA; Gerrard JL; Gothard K; Jung MW; Knierim JJ; Kudrimoti H; Qin Y; Skaggs WE; Suster M; Weaver KL
    J Exp Biol; 1996 Jan; 199(Pt 1):173-85. PubMed ID: 8576689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
    Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Keetch KM; Lyons J; Amazeen E; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15300347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Path integration in mammals.
    Etienne AS; Jeffery KJ
    Hippocampus; 2004; 14(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 15098724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Way-finding in displaced clock-shifted bees proves bees use a cognitive map.
    Cheeseman JF; Millar CD; Greggers U; Lehmann K; Pawley MD; Gallistel CR; Warman GR; Menzel R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(24):8949-54. PubMed ID: 24889633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural ensemble decoding reveals a correlate of viewer- to object-centered spatial transformation in monkey parietal cortex.
    Crowe DA; Averbeck BB; Chafee MV
    J Neurosci; 2008 May; 28(20):5218-28. PubMed ID: 18480278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and vestibular influences on head-direction cells in the anterior thalamus of the rat.
    Blair HT; Sharp PE
    Behav Neurosci; 1996 Aug; 110(4):643-60. PubMed ID: 8864258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects.
    Whitney D; Cavanagh P
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 3(9):954-9. PubMed ID: 10966628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats.
    Wang RF; Hermer L; Spelke ES
    Behav Neurosci; 1999 Jun; 113(3):475-85. PubMed ID: 10443775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs.
    Warren WH; Rothman DB; Schnapp BH; Ericson JD
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():152-163. PubMed ID: 28577445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space.
    Mamassian P
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Apr; 114(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 9166913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational maps in the brain.
    Knudsen EI; du Lac S; Esterly SD
    Annu Rev Neurosci; 1987; 10():41-65. PubMed ID: 3551761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles.
    Wang G; Obama S; Yamashita W; Sugihara T; Tanaka K
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 8(12):1768-75. PubMed ID: 16299500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of the cognitive map.
    Jacobs LF
    Brain Behav Evol; 2003; 62(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 12937351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.