These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8577951)

  • 21. Biological monitoring and Biological Limit Values (BLV): the strategy of the European Union.
    Bolt HM; Thier R
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Apr; 162(2-3):119-24. PubMed ID: 16326051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Biological monitoring of chemical exposure].
    Jakubowski M
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15156762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
    Schenk L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Criteria and standards for occupational exposures to airborne chemicals.
    Lippmann M
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1987 Jul; 4(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 2955877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies: the example of silica dust.
    Dahmann D; Taeger D; Kappler M; Büchte S; Morfeld P; Brüning T; Pesch B
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 18059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Emergency exposure limits: a guide to quality assurance and safety.
    Woudenberg F; van der Torn P
    Qual Assur; 1992 Oct; 1(4):249-93. PubMed ID: 1344216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metalworking fluid mist occupational exposure limits: a discussion of alternative methods.
    Cohen H; White EM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):501-7. PubMed ID: 16857649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Limitations of occupational air contaminant standards, as exemplified by the neurotoxin N-hexane.
    Lanska DJ
    J Public Health Policy; 1999; 20(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 10643170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Criteria for evaluating exposure to chemical substances in Poland: procedures for suppression and applications].
    Gromiec JP; Czerczak S
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12051153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative property-property relationships for computing occupational exposure limits and vapour hazard ratios of organic solvents.
    Debia M; Krishnan K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):583-601. PubMed ID: 21120751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Updating of hygiene standards for carbon disulfide based on health risk assessment.
    Stetkiewicz J; Wrońska-Nofer T
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1998; 11(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 9753892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Setting occupational exposure limits for pharmaceuticals.
    Naumann BD; Sargent EV
    Occup Med; 1997; 12(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 9153053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Awareness and understanding of occupational exposure limits in Sweden.
    Schenk L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 65(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 23376473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Limits of exposure in the prevention of damage of reproduction: an operational proposal].
    Figà-Talamanca I
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 1998; 20(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 9546095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Problems in assessing carcinogenic risk of exposure to chemical pollution of the environment].
    Novikov SM; Rumiantsev GN; Zholdakova ZI; Shashina EA; Ponomareva OV
    Gig Sanit; 1998; (1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9560935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The current status of hygiene standard setting for chemical substances in workplaces in China.
    Liang YX; Gu XQ
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Jan; 101(1-2):65-78. PubMed ID: 2057771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparative evaluation of maximum allowable exposure level of hazardous substances in the air of the working area established in China, Russia and USA].
    Gén-lin S
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1994; (1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7804709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of methodological approaches to the determination of safe levels of activity of harmful substances in the air of the working environment.
    Ulanova IP; Ivanov NG; Khalepo AI; Avilova GG; Germanová AL
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1980; 24(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 7440967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The significance of neurobehavioral tests for occupational exposure limits: an example from Sweden.
    Edling C; Lundberg P
    Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 11130268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.