BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8577963)

  • 1. MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them.
    Arena L; Morehouse HT; Safir J
    Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1373-94. PubMed ID: 8577963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems.
    Yang RK; Roth CG; Ward RJ; deJesus JO; Mitchell DG
    Radiographics; 2010 Jan; 30(1):185-99. PubMed ID: 20083593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging.
    Barish MA; Jara H
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 10382162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions.
    Huang SY; Seethamraju RT; Patel P; Hahn PF; Kirsch JE; Guimaraes AR
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(5):1439-60. PubMed ID: 26207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts.
    Morelli JN; Runge VM; Ai F; Attenberger U; Vu L; Schmeets SH; Nitz WR; Kirsch JE
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(3):849-66. PubMed ID: 21571661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intracranial chemical-shift artifacts on MR images of the brain: observations and relation to sampling bandwidth.
    Smith AS; Weinstein MA; Hurst GC; DeRemer DR; Cole RA; Duchesneau PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Jun; 154(6):1275-83. PubMed ID: 2110742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Singh DR; Chin MS; Peh WC
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2014 Feb; 18(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 24515878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast.
    Ojeda-Fournier H; Choe KA; Mahoney MC
    Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S147-64. PubMed ID: 18180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging instrumentation and image artifacts.
    Patton JA
    Radiographics; 1994 Sep; 14(5):1083-96; quiz 1097-8. PubMed ID: 7991815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling bandwidth and fat suppression: effects on long TR/TE MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T.
    Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Rifkin MD; Burk DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):419-25. PubMed ID: 2750630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: a clinical review.
    Herrick RC; Hayman LA; Taber KH; Diaz-Marchan PJ; Kuo MD
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):707-24. PubMed ID: 9153707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction.
    Peh WC; Chan JH
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Apr; 30(4):179-91. PubMed ID: 11392291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist's and radiologist's perspective.
    Graves MJ; Mitchell DG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 23960007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts: mechanism and clinical significance.
    Pusey E; Lufkin RB; Brown RK; Solomon MA; Stark DD; Tarr RW; Hanafee WN
    Radiographics; 1986 Sep; 6(5):891-911. PubMed ID: 3685515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine.
    Taber KH; Herrick RC; Weathers SW; Kumar AJ; Schomer DF; Hayman LA
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(6):1499-521. PubMed ID: 9821197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of hemorrhagic brain lesions: a comparison of dual-echo gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques.
    Melhem ER; Patel RT; Whitehead RE; Bhatia RG; Rockwell DT; Jara H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 9725319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial misregistration of vascular flow during MR imaging of the CNS: cause and clinical significance.
    Larson TC; Kelly WM; Ehman RL; Wehrli FW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Nov; 155(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 2120946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR imaging: a new fast clinical imaging technique.
    Feinberg DA; Oshio K
    Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 1924811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motion suppression in MR imaging of the liver: comparison of respiratory-triggered and nontriggered fast spin-echo sequences.
    Low RN; Alzate GD; Shimakawa A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 8976950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.