These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8578369)

  • 1. Anatomic considerations in lumbar posterolateral percutaneous procedures.
    Mirkovic SR; Schwartz DG; Glazier KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):1965-71. PubMed ID: 8578369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD).
    Hurday Y; Xu B; Guo L; Cao Y; Wan Y; Jiang H; Liu Y; Yang Q; Ma X
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):635-645. PubMed ID: 26922736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation.
    Infusa A; An HS; Glover JM; McGrady L; Lim TH; Riley LH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2218-23. PubMed ID: 8902965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An anatomic and radiographic study of lumbar facets relevant to percutaneous transfacet fixation.
    Su BW; Cha TD; Kim PD; Lee J; April EW; Weidenbaum M; Albert TJ; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):E384-90. PubMed ID: 19444051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.
    Davis TT; Hynes RA; Fung DA; Spann SW; MacMillan M; Kwon B; Liu J; Acosta F; Drochner TE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):785-93. PubMed ID: 25216400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomic Considerations of Intervertebral Disc Perspective in Lumbar Posterolateral Approach via Kambin's Triangle: Cadaveric Study.
    Lertudomphonwanit T; Keorochana G; Kraiwattanapong C; Chanplakorn P; Leelapattana P; Wajanavisit W
    Asian Spine J; 2016 Oct; 10(5):821-827. PubMed ID: 27790308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis.
    Ebraheim NA; Rollins JR; Xu R; Yeasting RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jun; 21(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 8725919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The anatomic rationale for transforaminal endoscopic interbody fusion: a cadaveric analysis.
    Hardenbrook M; Lombardo S; Wilson MC; Telfeian AE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Feb; 40(2):E12. PubMed ID: 26828881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen: anatomic study on predisposing factors.
    Cinotti G; De Santis P; Nofroni I; Postacchini F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Feb; 27(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 11805682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study.
    Uribe JS; Arredondo N; Dakwar E; Vale FL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Aug; 13(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 20672964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphometric analysis of the working zone for endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
    Min JH; Kang SH; Lee JB; Cho TH; Suh JK; Rhyu IJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Apr; 18(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 15800429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.
    Su BW; Kim PD; Cha TD; Lee J; April EW; Weidenbaum M; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1355-62. PubMed ID: 19478655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safe zone for retractor placement to the lumbar spine via the transpsoas approach.
    Spivak JM; Paulino CB; Patel A; Shanti N; Pathare N
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Apr; 21(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 23629994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
    Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Navigated percutaneous lumbosacral interbody fusion: a feasibility study with three-dimensional surgical simulation and cadaveric experiment.
    Wang Y; Le DQ; Li H; Wang M; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):E1105-11. PubMed ID: 21289578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
    Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An experimental study of lumbar destabilization. Restabilization and bone density.
    Bennett GJ; Serhan HA; Sorini PM; Willis BH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1448-53. PubMed ID: 9231962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation.
    Mitra SR; Datir SP; Jadhav SO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 11880829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine.
    Wiesner L; Kothe R; Rüther W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Aug; 24(15):1599-603. PubMed ID: 10457581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic consideration for lumbar percutaneous interbody fusion.
    Wimmer C; Maurer H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Oct; (379):236-41. PubMed ID: 11039812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.