These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8579018)

  • 1. Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.
    Newby KH; Moredock L; Rembert J; Wharton JM; Natale A
    Am Heart J; 1996 Feb; 131(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 8579018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leakage of energy to the body surface during defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) system--experimental evaluation during defibrillation shocks through the right ventricular lead and the subcutaneous active-can in canines.
    Niwano S; Kitano Y; Moriguchi M; Yoshizawa N; Kashiwa T; Suyama M; Toyoshima T; Izumi T
    Jpn Circ J; 2001 Mar; 65(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11266198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model.
    Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Loeser H; Rosenbaum C; Kuckertz E; Vogel M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Schoendube FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1435-41. PubMed ID: 9670188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
    Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal defibrillation with minimal skeletal muscle activation: a new paradigm toward painless defibrillation.
    Jayam V; Zviman M; Jayanti V; Roguin A; Halperin H; Berger RD
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Oct; 2(10):1108-13. PubMed ID: 16188591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator size on unipolar defibrillation system efficacy.
    Jones GK; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Johnson G; DeGroot P; Gleva MJ; Raitt M; Bardy GH
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):2940-3. PubMed ID: 7586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defibrillation efficacy comparing a subcutaneous array electrode versus an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a subcutaneous array electrode in addition to an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from active can versus array trials I and II.
    Gradaus R; Block M; Seidl K; Brunn J; Isgro F; Hammel D; Hauer B; Breithardt G; Bocker D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 11513444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.
    Bahu M; Knight BP; Weiss R; Hahn SJ; Goyal R; Daoud EG; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9869995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold.
    Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Khalighi K; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Ziemer G; Seipel L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2596-605. PubMed ID: 9894650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elevated defibrillation threshold when right-sided venous access is used for nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead implantation. The Endotak Investigators.
    Epstein AE; Kay GN; Plumb VJ; Voshage-Stahl L; Hull ML
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 6(11):979-86. PubMed ID: 8589875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
    Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of a single-lead unipolar transvenous defibrillator compared with a system employing an additional coronary sinus electrode. A prospective, randomized study.
    Kudenchuk PJ; Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Jun; 89(6):2641-4. PubMed ID: 8205676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.