These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580046)

  • 1. Individual differences in story comprehension and recall of poor readers.
    Wilkinson IA; Elkins J; Bain JD
    Br J Educ Psychol; 1995 Dec; 65 ( Pt 4)():393-407. PubMed ID: 8580046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral narrative context effects on poor readers' spoken language performance: story retelling, story generation, and personal narratives.
    Westerveld MF; Gillon GT
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Apr; 12(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 20420354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehension of temporal terms by good and poor readers.
    Macaruso P; Bar-Shalom E; Crain S; Shankweiler D
    Lang Speech; 1989; 32 ( Pt 1)():45-67. PubMed ID: 2622300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of paragraph comprehension test scores with reading versus listening-reading and multiple-choice versus nominal recall administration techniques: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Snider RL; Rintelmann JW; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 2):1131-5. PubMed ID: 2622726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of reading expressiveness on the listening comprehension of storybooks by prekindergarten children.
    Mira WA; Schwanenflugel PJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2013 Apr; 44(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 23633643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early oral language markers of poor reading performance in Hong Kong Chinese children.
    Liu PD; McBride-Chang C; Wong AM; Tardif T; Stokes SF; Fletcher P; Hua Shu
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(4):322-31. PubMed ID: 20445202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the reading comprehension of children with dysphonetic and dyseidetic dyslexia using story grammar.
    Newby RF; Caldwell JA; Recht DR
    J Learn Disabil; 1989; 22(6):373-80. PubMed ID: 2738471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recall of story schema categories by reading disabled adults: effect of mode of presentation.
    Gold R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 6866649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.
    Siegel LS
    J Learn Disabil; 1992 Dec; 25(10):618-29. PubMed ID: 1460383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability.
    Brady S; Shankweiler D; Mann V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Apr; 35(2):345-67. PubMed ID: 6842131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral language and narrative skills in children with specific language impairment with and without literacy delay: a three-year longitudinal study.
    Vandewalle E; Boets B; Boons T; Ghesquière P; Zink I
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012; 33(6):1857-70. PubMed ID: 22699257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of think-aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below-average readers.
    Laing SP; Kamhi AG
    J Learn Disabil; 2002; 35(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 15490540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.
    Shaywitz SE; Fletcher JM; Holahan JM; Shneider AE; Marchione KE; Stuebing KK; Francis DJ; Pugh KR; Shaywitz BA
    Pediatrics; 1999 Dec; 104(6):1351-9. PubMed ID: 10585988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U language-related differences between discrepancy-defined and non-discrepancy-defined poor readers: a longitudinal study of dyslexia in New Zealand.
    Tunmer WE; Chapman JW
    Dyslexia; 2007 Feb; 13(1):42-66. PubMed ID: 17330735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading comprehension in children with specific language impairment: an examination of two subgroups.
    Kelso K; Fletcher J; Lee P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2007; 42(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 17365085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonologic and semantic processing in reading-disabled and nondisabled males at two age levels.
    Waterman B; Lewandowski L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Feb; 55(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 8433084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension.
    Merritt DD; Liles BZ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 3695446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers.
    Geva E; Massey-Garrison A
    J Learn Disabil; 2013; 46(5):387-401. PubMed ID: 23213049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities.
    Catts HW; Hogan TP; Fey ME
    J Learn Disabil; 2003; 36(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 15493430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of reading and listening-reading techniques for administration of PIAT Reading Comprehension subtest: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):672-4. PubMed ID: 3399347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.