These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580098)

  • 21. Effect of flexural strength of orthodontic resin cement on bond strength of metal brackets to enamel surfaces.
    Li J
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 20937669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets.
    Egan FR; Alexander SA; Cartwright GE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 8540484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.
    Kim YK; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 25548147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bonding to previously bleached teeth.
    Homewood C; Tyas M; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2001 Mar; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 11506167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 10982929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of silica coating and silane surface conditioning on the bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to enamel.
    Atsü SS; Gelgör IE; Sahin V
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 17029522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro study of the effect of Pro Seal varnish on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    El Bokle D; Munir H
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18575308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Böhme A
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 11725672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bond strengths of ceramic brackets using different bonding techniques.
    Blight SJ; Lynch E
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 7786864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.