273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580141)
1. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
Häussler MD; Lenzen H; Reckels C; Peters PE
Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
Shimizu T; Yamamoto K; Ogura Y; Aratake K; Nakata Y; Saika Y; Sagami A; Ashina K; Sueyoshi K; Narabayashi I
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnosis of metastases in thoracic images. Progress by further development of the conventional film-foil technique?].
Lehmann KJ; Himmighöfer U
Radiologe; 1994 Oct; 34(10):592-8. PubMed ID: 7816917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
