These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580142)

  • 1. [An improved method for determining the mean parenchyma dose in mammography].
    Klein R; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 8580142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation into the impact of anatomical variation upon mean glandular dose produced within a standard breast.
    Wilkinson LE; Heggie JC; Johnston PN
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Jun; 22(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 10474976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
    Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Young KC; Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3225-40. PubMed ID: 11098900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating mean glandular dose using proprietary mammography phantoms.
    Hartley LD; Cobb BJ; Hutchinson DE
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10028638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mean glandular dose to patients from stereotactic breast biopsy procedures.
    Paixão L; Chevalier M; Hurtado-Romero AE; Garayoa J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145008. PubMed ID: 29877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):306-325. PubMed ID: 27991451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
    Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.