172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580501)
1. Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.
Needleman AR; Crandell CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 8580501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS
J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
Souza PE; Turner CW
J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers.
Larsby B; Arlinger S
Audiology; 1994; 33(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 8042937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.
Hargus SE; Gordon-Salant S
J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 7731214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
