These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580502)

  • 1. Target-matched insertion gain derived from three different hearing aid selection procedures.
    Punch JL; Shovels AH; Dickinson WW; Calder JH; Snead C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 8580502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of routine in-the-ear measurement of hearing aid gain.
    Swan IR; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Oct; 29(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 8838549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertion gain measurements using two low-powered analogue hearing aids.
    Norman M; James P
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 11201324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Scollie S; Seewald R; Moodie S; Pumford J; Liu KP
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):199-226. PubMed ID: 16424946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids.
    Erickson FN; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 2046359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coupler-related real ear gain. Interaction between subject and hearing aid type.
    Berninger E; Ovegård A; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 1585125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids.
    Aazh H; Moore BC; Prasher D
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 22846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insertion gain versus median ear corrected coupler gain: a comparison of two fitting methods in new NHS hearing aid users.
    Harrowven RG
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Jun; 32(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 9710334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Filtering to match hearing aid insertion gain to individual ear acoustics.
    Bell SL
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Sep; 13(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 19713209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.