These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8580502)

  • 21. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of twelve methods for estimating the real ear gain of hearing aids.
    Dillon H; Murray N
    Ear Hear; 1987 Feb; 8(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 3556806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coupler and real-ear measurement of hearing aid gain and output in the NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial.
    Bratt GW; Rosenfeld MA; Peek BF; Kang J; Williams DW; Larson V
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 12195173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of an 'intuitive' NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification.
    Parsons JO; Clark CR
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Sep; 41(6):357-62. PubMed ID: 12353608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noise analysis of real-life listening situations for maximal speech audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Köbler S; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 10489867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and maximum power output in subjects recently fitted with NHS hearing aids.
    Munro KJ; Nind L; Cleaver VC
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Aug; 30(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 8879692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prescriptive amplification recommendations for hearing losses with a conductive component and their impact on the required maximum power output: an update with accompanying clinical explanation.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 23886423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Kopun J; Mace AL; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 8979039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids in the elderly.
    Meredith R; Stephens D
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 8146584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Allowing for real ear venting effects when selecting the coupler gain of hearing aids.
    Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):406-16. PubMed ID: 1797608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing-aid pre-selection through a neural network.
    Arntsen O; Koren H; Strøm T
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 8975998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement.
    Peek BF; Rosenfeld MA; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 17580724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of routine real ear measurement of the gain of digital hearing aids.
    Aazh H; Moore BC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):653-64. PubMed ID: 18326152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.