182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8581530)
1. Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method.
Diab KM; Sevastik JA; Hedlund R; Suliman IA
Eur Spine J; 1995; 4(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 8581530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees--a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves.
Kotwicki T; Dubousset J; Padovani JP
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):972-81. PubMed ID: 16586108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of concave and convex rib-vertebral angle, angle difference, and angle ratio in patients with lenke type 1 main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by observation, bracing or posterior fusion, and instrumentation.
Canavese F; Holveck J; De Coulon G; Kaelin A
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 21336172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks.
Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Parent F; de Guise JA; Labelle H
Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9548361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reexamination of the Cobb and Ferguson angles: bigger is not always better.
Stokes IA; Aronson DD; Ronchetti PJ; Labelle H; Dansereau J
J Spinal Disord; 1993 Aug; 6(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8219547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Changhai fulcrum bending radiographic technique to assess curve flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
Wang F; Li J; Chen Z; Wu H; Li B; He X; Wei X; Yi H; Wang C; Bai Y; Zhu X; Li M
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 52(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 25034743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic pseudoscoliosis in healthy male subjects following voluntary lateral translation (side glide) of the thoracic spine.
Harrison DE; Betz JW; Cailliet R; Colloca CJ; Harrison DD; Haas JW; Janik TJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 16401449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before operation].
Fei Q; Wang YP; Qiu GX; Zhao Y; Shen JX; Zhang JG; Zhao LJ; Yin RF; Wang NG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 87(35):2484-8. PubMed ID: 18067811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic measurement error of the scoliotic curve angle depending on positioning of the patient and the side of scoliotic curve.
Schmid SL; Buck FM; Böni T; Farshad M
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 26423748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer.
Korovessis PG; Stamatakis MV
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8839469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study of the rib cage deformity in children with 10 degrees-20 degrees of Cobb angle late onset idiopathic scoliosis, using rib-vertebra angles--aetiologic implications.
Grivas TB; Samelis P; Chadziargiropoulos T; Polyzois B
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():20-4. PubMed ID: 15457688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of disc and vertebral wedging between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis.
Wang S; Qiu Y; Ma W; Wang B; Yu Y; Qian B; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Sun X
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 21617568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis.
Loder RT; Urquhart A; Steen H; Graziano G; Hensinger RN; Schlesinger A; Schork MA; Shyr Y
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):768-70. PubMed ID: 7559707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral spinal profile in school-screening referrals with and without late onset idiopathic scoliosis 10 degrees-20 degrees.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Samelis P; Maziotou C; Kandris K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():25-31. PubMed ID: 15457689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
